Диссертация (Научная объективность в исторической перспективе), страница 10

Daston, L. On Scientific Observation / L. Daston // Isis. — 2008. —99. —P. 97-110.316. Daston, L. Speechless. Introduction // Things that Talk: Object Lessons fromArt and Science / Ed. L. Daston. — New York, 2008. — P. 9-26.317. Daston, L. The coming into Being of Scientific Objects. Introduction //Biographies of Scientific Objects / Ed. L.

Daston. Chicago and London. —2000. — P. 1-14.318. Daston, L., Galison, P. Objectivity / L. Daston, P. Galison. — New York: ZoneBooks, 2007. — 501 p.319. Daston, L., Galison, P. The Image of Objectivity / L. Daston, P. Galison //Representation, 1992. —40, Special Issue: Seeng Sciense. — P. 81-128.320. Dear, P. From Truth to Disinterestedness in Seventeenth Century / P. Dear //Social Studies of Science.

— 1992. —22. — P. 619-631.321. Deely, J.N. Purely Objective Reality / J.N. Deely. — Berlin: Walter deGruyter, 2009. — 217 p.322. Discerson, A.B. Kant on Representation and Objectivity / A.B. Discerson. —Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. — 217 p.323. Douglas, H. Inductive Risk and Values in Science / H.

Douglas / Philosophy ofScience. — 2000. —67. P. 559-579.324. Douglas, H. The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity / H. Douglas //Synthese, 2004. — Vol. 138.. 3. — P. 453-473.325. Doule, J. Suarez and the Analogy of Being / J. Doule // Modern schoolman. —1969. — Vol. 46. —3. — P. 219-249.343326. Dumont, S. Scotus’s Doctrine of Univocity and the Medieval Tradition ofMetaphisics / S. Dumont // Topoi. 1992. —11. — P.

193-212.327. Edley, N. Unravelling social constructionism / N. Edley // Theory &Psychology. — 2001. — Vol.11. — P. 433-441.328. Elliott, K. Direct and Indirect Roles for Values in Science / K. Elliott /Philosophy of Science. — 2011. —78.

— P. 303-324.329. Ellis, B. D. Truth and Objectivity / B.D. Ellis. — Cambridge: Blackwell Pub,1991. — 256 p.330. Ethical objectivism // The Encyclopedia of Philosophy in 8 Vols. / Ed. P.Edvards. — N.Y., London: The Macmillan Company & The Free Press;Collier-Macmillan limited, 1967. — Vol.3. — P.71-75.331. Fabian, J. Ethnographic Objectivity Revisited: From Rigor to Vigor //Rethinking Objectivity / Ed. A. Megill. — Durham; London, 1994. — P. 3764.332. Fine, A. Viewpoint of No-one in Particular / F.

Fine // Proceeding andAddresses of PA, 1998. — Vol.72. —2. — P. 9-20.333. Fuller, S. Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies //Science as Practice and Culture / Ed. A. Pickering. — Chicago and London. —The University of Chicago Press, 1992. — P. 390-348.334. Fuller, S. Social Epistemology and the Research Agenda of Science Studies //Science as Practice and Culture / Ed. A. Pickering.

— Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1992. — P. 390 — 428.335. Galison, P. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics / P. Galison.— Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. — 982 p.336. Galison, P. How the Experiment End / P. Galison. — Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1987. — 330 p.337. Galison, P. Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science / P. Galison //Isis. — 2008. — Vol. 99.

—1. — P. 111-125.344338. Gaukroger, S. Objectivity. A Very Short Introduction / S. Gaukroger. — Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2012. — 112 p.339. Gillespie, Ch.C. The Edge of Objctivity: An Essays in the History of ScientificIdeas / Ch. C. Gilespie. — Princeton: Princeton University press, 1960. — 576.340. Gracia, J.J. Suares and Metaphysical Mentalism: the Last Visit / J.J. Gracia //American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. — 1993.

— Vol. 67. —3. —P. 349-354.341. Gracia, J.J. Suárez and the Doctrine of the Transcendentalis. / J.J. Gracia //Topoi. — 1992. —11. —2. — P. 121-133.342. Gracia, J.J. Suarez's Conception of Metaphysics: A Step in the Direction ofMentalism / J.J. Gracia // American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. — 1991.— Vol. 65. —3. — P.

287-310.343. Greenawalt, K. Law and Objectivity / K. Greenawalt. — New York: OxfordUniversity press, 1992. — 299 p.344. Gross, P.R., Levitt N. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its QuarrelsWith Science / P.R. Gross, N. Levitt. — Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UniversityPress, 1994.

— 314 p.345. Guyer, P. Kant / P. Guer. — London and New York: Routledge, 2006. — 456p.346. Hacking, I. Historical Ontology / I. Hacking. — Cambridge, Mass.: HarvardUniversity Press, 2002. — 279 p.347. Hacking, I. The Social Construction of What? / I. Hacking. — Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999. — 223 p.348. Haely, K.C. Objectivity in the Feminist Philosophy of Science: Dissertation /K.C.

Haely. — Ohio State University, 2003.349. Hall, A.R. On Whiggism / A.R. Hall // History of Science. — 1983. —21.— P. 45-59.350. Harding, S. «Strong objectivity»: a Response to the New Objectivity Question/ S. Harding // Synthese. -1995. —104. — P. 331-349.345351. Henrich, D. The Proof Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction / D.Henrich // Review of Metaphysics. — 1969. —22. — P.

640-659.352. Iggers, G.G. Historicism: The History and Meaning of the Term / G.G. Iggers// Journal of the History of Ideas. — 1995. —56 (1). — P. 129-152.353. Janack, M. Dilemmas of Objectivity / M. Janack // Social Epistemology: AJournal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy. — 2002. — Vol.16. —3.

— .267-281.354. Jardine, N. Whiggs and Stories. Herberd Butterfield and the Historiography ofScience / N. Jardine // History of science. — 2003. — 41 (132). — P. 125-140.355. Kaiser, D. Whose Mass is it Anyway? Practical Cosmology and the Objects ofTheory / D. Kaiser // Social studies of Science — 2006. —36. — P. 533-564.356. Kaufman, D. W. Descartes on the Objective Reality of Materially False Ideas /D.W. Kaufman // Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. — 2000.

— V.81. —4.— P. 385-408.357. Keller, E. F. Reflections on Gender and Science / E.F. Keller. — New Haven,CN: Yale University Press, 1985. — 212 p.358. Keller, E.F. The Paradox of Scientific Subjectivity // Rethinking Objectivity /Ed. A. Megill. Durham; London, 1994. — P. 313-331.359.

Kitcher, P. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivitywithout Illusions / P. Kitcher. — N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1995. — 432p.360. Kosso, P. Science and Objectivity / P. Kosso // The Journal of philosophy. —1989. —86. — P. 245-257.361. Kusch, M. Hacking’s Epistemology: a Critique of Styles of Reasoning / M.Kusch // Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.

— 2010. —41. —P. 158-173.362. Lacey, H. Is Science Value-Free? / H. Lacey. — London: Routledge, 1999. —285 p.346363. Latour, B. Do Scientific Objects Have a History? Paster and Whitehead in aBath of Lactic Acid / B. Latour // Common Knowledge. — 1999. —5. —P. 76-91.364. Latour, B. On Partial Existence of Existing and Nonexisting Objects //Biographies of Scientific Objects / Ed. L.

Daston. — Chicago and London,2000. — P. 247-269.365. Latour, B. Pandora's Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies / B.Latour. — Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. — 336 p.366. Latour, B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers ThroughSociety / B. Latour.

— Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. — 1987.— 282 p.367. Latour, B., Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts /B. Latour, S. Woolgar. — Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. — 294p.368. Laudan, L. Progress and its Problems: towards a Theory of Scientific Growth /L. Laudan. — Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977. — 272 p.369.

Laudan, L. A Confutation of Convergent Realism // The Philosophy of Science/ Ed. D. Papineau. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. — 352 p.370. Lloyd, E.A. Objectivity and the Double Standard for Feminist Epistemologies /E.A. Lloyd // Synthese. — 1995. —104. — P. 351-381.371. Longino, H.E. Science as Social knowledge: Values and Objectivity inScientific Inquiry / H.E. Longino. — Princeton.: Princeton University Press,1990. — 262 p.372. Machan, T. R. Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy,Science, and Everyday Life / T.R. Machan.

— Aldershot, Hants, England;Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 2004. — 123 p.373. Malyshkin, E. Two Metaphor of Memory in Early Modern Philosophy / E.Malyshkin // Problemos. — 2013. —84. — P. 36-45.347374. Meerbot, R. Kant’s Use of Notions «Objective Reality» and «Objectivevalidity» / R Meerbot // Kant-Studien. — 1972. —63. — P. 51-58.375. Megill, A. Introduction: Four Senses of Objectivity // Rethinking Objectivity /Ed.

A. Megill. — Durham and London, 1994. — P. 1-20.376. Montuschi, E. Rethinking Objectivity in Social Science / E. Montuschi //Social Epistemology: a Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy. — 2004. —Vol.18. —2-3. — P. 109-122.377. Moro Abadia, O. Beyond the Whig Interpretation of History: Lessons ofPresentism from Helene Metzger / O. Moro Abadia // Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science.

— 2008. — Part A. —39(2). — P. 194-201.378. Moro Abadia, O. Hermeneutical Contribution to the History of Science:Gadamer on «Presentism» / O. Moro Abadia // Studies in History andPhilosophy of Science. — 2011. — Part A. —42. — P. 372-380.379. Moser, P. Philosophy after Objectivity. Making Sense in Perspective / P. Moser. —New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. — 267 p.380. Mulkay M.J. Sociology of Science: a Sociological Pilgrimage / M.J.

MulkayMilton Keynes: Open University press, 1991. — 248 p.381. Nadler, S. Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas / S. Nadler. —Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989. — 205 p.382. Nagell, T. The Limits of Objectivity / T. Nagell. — Brasenose College, OxfordUniversity, 1979. — 139 p.383. Nagell, . The View from Nowhere / T. Nagell. — Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1989. — 256 p.384. Nanay, B. Rational Reconstruction Reconsidered / B. Nanay // The Monist.

—2010. — Vol. 93. — P. 598-617.385. Nelson, A. How Could Scientific Facts be Socially Constructed? / A. Nelson //Studies in the history and philosophy of science and technology. — 1994. —25. — P. 535-547.348386. Nozick, R. Invariance and Objectivity / R. Nozick // Proceeding and Addressesof PA. — 1998. —72. — P. 21-48.387.