Диссертация (Социокультурные паттерны родственных отношений в условиях большого города (на примере Санкт-Петербурга)), страница 51

McHale S. Sibling Relationships and Influences in Childhood and Adolescence / S. McHale,K. Updegraff, S. Whiteman // Journal of Marriage and the Family. – 2012. – № 74 (5). –Pp.913 – 930.125. Morman M. Turning points of closeness in the sibling relationship / M. Morman, P. Herrick //Paper presented at the annual meeting of the NCA 94th Annual Convention, TBA. – SanDiego, Nov 20, 2008.126. Needham R.

Remarks on the Analysis of Kinship and Marriage / R. Needham // RethinkingKinship and Marriage / ed. by R. Needham. – London: Psychology Press, 2004. – Pp. 1-34.127. New Directions in Anthropological Kinship / ed. by S.Linda. – Rowman & LittlefieldPublishers, 2002. – 368 pp.128. Obendick H. When siblings determine your “fate”: sibling support and educational mobilityin rural northwest China / H.

Obendick // The Anthropology of Sibling Relations: SharedParentage, Experience, and Exchange / eds E. Alber, C. Cati, T. Thelen. – N \ew York:PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2013. – Pp. 97-122.129. Ottenheimer M. The Current Controversy in Kinship / M. Ottenheimer // Czech SociologicalReview. – 2001. – Vol. 9. – No. 2.

– Pp. 201-210.182130. Parsons T. The Kinship System of the Contemporary United States / T. Parsons // AmericanAnthropologist, New Series. – Vol. 45. – No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1943). – Pp. 22-38.131. Patterson C. J. Family relationships of lesbians and gay men / C. J. Patterson // Journal ofMarriage and the Family. – 2000. – №62. – Pp.1052 – 1069.132. Pauli J. «Sharing Made Us Sisters»: Sisterhood, Migration, and Household Dynamics inMexico and Namibia / J. Pauli // The Anthropology of Sibling Relations: Shared Parentage,Experience, and Exchange / eds E. Alber, C.

Cati, T. Thelen. – New York: PALGRAVEMACMILLAN, 2013. – Pp. 29–50.133. Pehrson R. The Bilateral Network of Social Relations in Kankllma Lapp District / R. Pehrson.– Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore andLinguistics. 1957. – 128 p.134. Peletz M. Kinship studies in late twentieth-century anthropology / M/ Peletz // AnnualReview of Anthropology. – 1995. – Vol.

24. – Pp. 343-372.135. Pollock D. Looking for a sister: culina siblingship and affinity / D. Pollock // The siblingrelationship in lowland South America. Working Papers on South American Indians, 7 / ed.by K.Kensinger. – Bennington College Bookstore, 1985. – Pp. 8-15.136. Pina-Cabral J. The two faces of mutuality: Contemporary themes in anthropology /J. PinaCabral // Anthropological Quarterly. – 2013. – Vol. 86. – Issue 1. – Pp.

257-276.137. Ramu G.N. Brothers and Sisters in India: A Study of Urban Adult Siblings / Ramu G. N. –Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006. – 269 p.138. Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies // eds S. Franklin, S. McKinnon. – Durham andLondon: Duke University Press, 2001. – 536 p.139. Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation / eds S. Franklin,H. Ragone. – Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998. – 245 p.140. Rosenberg G.S. Sibling solidarity in the working class / G.

S. Rosenberg, D.F. Anspach //Journal of Marriage and the Family. – 1973. – Vol. 35. – Pp. 108–113.141. Sahlins M. What kinship is — and is not / M. Sahlins. – Chicago: The University of ChicagoPress, 2013. – 110 p.142. Schans D. Sibling relationships in Dutch and immigrant families / D. Schans, M. Voorpostel// Ethnic and Racial Studies. – 2011. – Vol. 34. – Issue 12.

– Pp. 2027-2047.143. Schneider D. American kinship: а cultural account / D. Schneider. – Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1980. – 137 p.144. Schneider D. Conclusions / D. Schneider // Siblingship in Oceania / ed. by M. Marshall. –Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1981. – Pp. 389-404.183145. Schneider D. A Critique of the study of kinship / D. Schneider. – Ann Arbor: The Universityof Michigan Press, 1984. – 208p.146. Schneider D.

The Content of Kinship / D. Schneider // Man. – Vol. 65 (Jul. - Aug., 1965). –Pp. 122-123.147. Schneider D. The Nature of Kinship / D. Schneider // Man. – Vol. 64 (Nov. - Dec., 1964). –Pp. 180-181.148. Schneider D. What is kinship all about? / D. Schneider // Kinship and family / ed.

by R.Parkin, L. Stone. – Blackwell publishing, 2007. – Pp. 257-274.149. Schneider D. Schneider on Schneider: The Conversion of the Jews and Other AnthropologicalStories / D. Schneider, R. Handler. – Durham, N.C: Duke University Press. 1995. – 264 p.150. Schneider D., Homans G. Kinship Terminology and the American Kinship System / D.Schneider, G. Homans // American Anthropologist, New Series. – Vol. 57.

– No. 6, The U. S.A. as Anthropologists See It (Dec., 1955). – Pp. 1194-1208.151. Schweitzer P. Introduction / P. Schweitzer // Dividends of kinship. Meaning and uses ofsocial relatedness / ed. by P.Schweitzer. – London: Routledge, 2000. – Pp. 1-33152. Segalen M. The shift in kinship studies in France: the case of grandparenting / M. Segalen //Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studie / eds S.Franklin, S.McKinnon. – Durham andLondon: Duke University Press, 2001. – Pp. 246-273.153. Sena-Rivera J. Extended Kinship in the United States: Competing Models and the Case of laFamilia Chicana / S.

Sena-Rivera // Journal of Marriage and Family. – Vol. 41. – No. 1 (Feb.,1979). – Pp. 121-129.154. Siblingship in Oceania / ed. by M. Marshall. – Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.1981. – 422 p.155. Stafford C. Chinese patriliny and the cycles of Yang and Laiwang / C. Stafford // Cultures ofrelatedness: new approaches to the study of kinship / ed. by J.Carsten. – Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2000. – Pp. 37-54.156.

Stone L. Introduction: theoretical implications of new directions in anthropological kinship /S. Stone // New Directions in Anthropological Kinship / ed. by L. Stone. – Rowman &Littlefield Publishers, 2002. – Pp. 1-20.157. Stone L. Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500-1800 / L.

Stone. – New York: Harper &Row. 1979. – 446 p.158. Strathern M. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society inMelanesia / M. Strathern. – Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988. –437 p.184159. Strathern M. Reproducing the Future: Essays on Anthropology, Kinship and the NewReproductive Technologies / M Strathern. – Manchester: Manchester University Press.

1992.– 224 p.160. Sweetser D. The Structure of Sibling Relationships / D. Sweetser // American Journal ofSociology. – Vol. 76. – No. 1 (Jul., 1970). – Pp. 47-58.161. Terrell J. Anthropology and Adoption / J. Terrell, J. Modell // American Anthropologist, NewSeries. – 1994. – Vol. 96. – No.

1. – Pp. 155-161.162. Thelen T. The Anthropology of Sibling Relations: Explorations in Shared Parentage,Experience, and Exchange / T. Thelen, C. Coe, E. Alber // The Anthropology of SiblingRelations: Shared Parentage, Experience, and Exchange / eds E. Alber, C. Cati, T. Thelen. –New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2013.

– Pp. 1–26.163. Thompson L. The Dyad as the Unit of Analysis: Conceptual and Methodological Issues / L.Thompson, A. Walker // Journal of Marriage and Family. – Vol. 44. – No. 4, Methodology:The Other Side of Caring (Nov., 1982). – Pp. 889-900.164. Troll E. The Family of Later Life: A Decade Review / E. Troll // Journal of Marriage andFamily. – Vol. 33. – No. 2, Decade Review.

Part 3 (May, 1971). – Pp. 263-290.165. Trost J. Family Structure and Relationships: The Dyadic Approach / J. Trost // Journal ofComparative Family Studies. – Vol. 27. – No. 2, 25TH ANNIVERSARY FAMILIES IN ACHANGING WORLD (SUMMER 1996). – Pp. 395-408.166. Van der Geest S. Kinship as Friendship: Brothers and Sisters in Kwahu, Ghana / S.

Van derGeest // The Anthropology of Sibling Relations: Shared Parentage, Experience, and Exchange/ eds. E. Alber, C. Cati, T. Thelen. – New York: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2013. – Pp.51–70.167. Viglione V. Adult sibling grief in the eleven years after September 11, 2001 / V. Viglione. –Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC. 2013. – 222 p.168. Voorpostel M. For better or worse: Negative life events and sibling relationships / M.Voorpostel, T. Lippe, H. Flap // International Sociology.

– 2012. – Vol.27. – Pp. 330-348.169. Weber F. Rethinking kinship today. The strength of the everyday / F. Weber // Éditions Rued’Ulm, collection «Sciences sociales». – Paris, October 2013. [Электронный ресурс]http://www.presses.ens.fr/client/document/traductionintro_393.pdf170.

Wegar K. Adoption, Family Ideology, and Social Stigma: Bias in Community Attitudes,Adoption Research, and Practice / K. Wegar // Family Relations. – Vol. 49. – No. 4 (Oct.,2000). – Pp. 363-370.185171. Weisner T. Overview: Sibling Similarity and Difference in Different Cultures / T. Weisner //Siblings in South Asia: brothers and sisters in cultural context / ed. by C. Nuckolls. – NewYork: Guilford Press, 1993. – Pp. 1–17.172. Weston K. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship / K.

Weston. – New York:Columbia University Press, 1997. – 288 p.173. White L. Sibling Relationships over the Life Course: A Panel Analysis / L. White // Journal ofMarriage and Family. – Vol. 63. – No. 2 (May, 2001). – Pp. 555-568.174. White L. Ties among Adult Siblings / L. White, A. Riedmann // Social Forces. – Vol. 71.

–No. 1 (Sep., 1992). – Pp. 85-102.175. Wilson T. Urbanism and Kinship Bonds: A Test of Four Generalizations / T. Wilson // SocialForces. – Vol. 71. – No. 3 (Mar., 1993). – Pp. 703-712.176. Yan Y. Practicing kinship in rural North China / Y. Yan // Relative values: reconfiguringkinship studies / eds S.Franklin, S.McKinnon.

– Durham and London: Duke University Press,2001. – Pp. 224-245.177. Yanagisako S. Two Processes of Change in Japanese-American Kinship / S. Yanagisako //Journal of Anthropological Research. – Vol. 31. – No. 3 (Autumn, 1975). – Pp. 196-224.178. Yanagisako S. Women-Centered Kin Networks in Urban Bilateral Kinship / S. Yanagisako //American Ethnologist.