Диссертация (Социально-философские воззрения Марка Туллия Цицерона), страница 73
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Социально-философские воззрения Марка Туллия Цицерона". PDF-файл из архива "Социально-философские воззрения Марка Туллия Цицерона", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "философия" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой докторскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени доктора философских наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 73 страницы из PDF
Vol. 116. No. 1. P. 123–135.457. Robbins С. The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studiesin the Transmission, Development and Circumstance of English LiberalThought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the ThirteenColonies. Cambr., 1961.458. Rolfe J. Cicero and His Influence. N.Y., 1963. VII, 178 p.459. Rosler A. Political Authority and Obligation in Aristotle. Oxf.,2005.460. Rothschild E. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, andthe Enlightenment. Cambr. (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2001.461.
Ruch M. L’Hortensius de Cicéron: histoire et reconstitution. P.,1958.462. Rüegg W. Cicero in Mittelalter und Humanismus // Lexikon desMittelalters. 1983. No. 2. S. 2063–2077.396463. Ryan F.X. Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate.Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1998.464. Saint-Simon H. Oeuvres de Saint-Simon et d’Enfantin.
T. 18. P.,1868.465. Saller R. Personal Patronage under the Early Empire. Cambr.,2002.466. Schmidt P.L. Cicero De re publica: Die Forschung der letzten fünfDezennien // ANRW. T. I.4. S. 262–333.467. Schmitt C.B. Cicero Scepticus: a Study of the Influence of theAcademica in the Renaissance. Hague, 1972.468. Schmüdderich L. Versuch einer Einführung in Ciceros Schrift Dere publica durch Interpretation von I. 36–45 // Der AltsprachlicheUnterricht.
1965. Bd. 8. H. 5. S. 23–30.469. Schofield M. Cicero for and against Divination // JRS. 1986. Vol.76. P. 47–65.470. Schryvers P.A. Invention, imagination, et theorie des emotionschez Ciceron et Quintilien // Rhetoric Revalued: Papers from theInternational Society for the History of Rhetoric / Ed. by B. Vickers.Binghamton, 1982. Р. 47–57.471. Schuetrump E. Platonic Elements in the Structure of Cicero, Deoratore Book I // Rhetorica. 1988.
No. 6. Р. 237–258.472. Schumpeter J. Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischenNationalökonomie. Lpz., 1908.473. Schwamborn H. M. Tullius Cicero De re publica, vollständigeTextausgabe und Kommentar. Paderborn, 1971.474. Sedley D. Cicero and the Timaeus // Aristotle, Plato andPythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New Directions for Philosophy / Ed.by M. Schofield. Cambr., 2013. P. 187–205.475. Seel O. Cicero. Wort – Staat – Welt. Stuttgart, 1961.397476.
Segvic H. From Protagoras to Aristotle: Essays in Ancient MoralPhilosophy. Princeton, 2009.477. Shackleton Bailey D.R. Cicero. N.Y., 1971.478. Sibley M.Q. Political Ideas and Ideologies: a History of PoliticalThought. N.Y., 1975.479. Sidney A. The Works. London, 1772.480. Sihler E. Cicero of Arpinum: A Political and Literary BiographyBeing a Contribution to the History of Ancient Civilization and a Guide to theStudy of Cicero’s Writings. Yale, 1914.481. Sihler E.G. Lucretius and Cicero // TAPhA.
1897. Vol. 28. Р. 42–54.482. Silva Filho L.M. A definição de populus n’a cidade de Deus deAgostinho: uma controvérsia com Da república de Cícero. São Paulo, 2008.483. Sinclair T. A History of Greek Polítical Thought, Cleveland, 1961.484. Skydsgaard J.E., Ascani K. Ancient History Matters. Rome, 2002.485. Smith R.E. Cicero the Statesman. Cambr.: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1966.
VII, 269 p.486. Smith W. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities. N.Y.,1884.487. Smuts J.C. Holism and Evolution. L., 1927.488. Social Inequality / Ed. by M. Neckerman. N.Y.: Russell SageFoundation, 2004.489. Solmsen F. Aristotle and Cicero on the Orator's Playing upon theFeelings // CP. 1938.
Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 390–404.490. Solmsen F. Cicero on religio and superstitio // The ClassicalWeekly. 1944. Vol. 37. No. 14. P. 159–160.491. Souter A. Augustinian Readings in Cicero and Pliny // CR. 1900.Vol. 14. No. 5. Р. 264.492. Spaeth Jr. J. Cicero, Model for Lucretius? // CJ. 1946. Vol. 42.
N.2. Р. 105–106.398493. Spaeth W. Cicero, Seneca, and the Newspaper Man // CJ. 1933.Vol. 28. No. 9. P. 680–682.494. Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike. Tübingen, 1991.495. Stark R. Ciceros Staatsdefinition // La Nouvelle Clio. 1954. N. 6. P.56–69.496. Stevens B. The Origin of Language in Greek and Roman Thought.Diss. PhD. Chicago, 2005.497. Strong H. Cicero and Lucretius // CR.
1914. Vol. 28. No. 4. Р. 142.498. Sumner G.V. Cicero on the comitia centuriata: De re publica, II,22, 39–40 // AJPh. 1960. Vol. 81. No. 2. Р. 136–156.499. Syme R. The Roman Revolution. Oxf.: Oxford University Press.2002. 568 p.500. Tan J. Contiones in the Age of Cicero // ClAnt. 2008. Vol.
27. Р.163–201.501. Tatum J. Roman Democracy? // The Companion to the Greek andRoman Political Thought / Ed. by R.K. Balot. 2009. Р. 214–228.502. Taylor H. Cicero: A Sketch of His life and Works. Chicago, 1918.503. Taylor J. St. Augustine and the “Hortensius” of Cicero // Studiesin Philology. 1963. Vol. 60. No. 3. Р. 487–498.504. Taylor L.R. The Corrector of the Codex of Cicero’s De re publica //AJPh. 1961.
Vol. 82. No. 4. Р. 337–345.505. Tempest K. Cicero: Politics and Persuasion in Ancient Rome.Auckland, 2011. XVI, 256 p.506. Testard M. Saint Augustin et Cicerón. T. 1–2. P., 1958.507. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period / Ed. by D.Taylor. Amsterdam, 1987.508. Thieme H. Naturrecht und römisches Recht // La formazionestorica del diritto moderno in Europa. Firenze, 1977. P. 95–111.509. Tönnies F.
Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Lpz., 1887.510. Tönnies F. Die Entwicklung der sozialen Frage. Lpz., 1907.399511. Tönnies F. Soziologische Studien und Kritiken. Bd. I–III. Jena,1924–1929.512. Treggiari S. Terentia, Tullia and Publilia: The Women of Cicero’sFamily. N.Y.: Routledge, 2007. XXII, 228 p.513. Treggiari S. The Freedmen of Cicero // G&R.
1969. Vol. 16. No. 2.Р. 195–204.514. Trencsebyi-Waldapfel I. Ciceron et Lucrèce // AAntHung. 1958. T.6. P. 321–383.515. Trollope A. The Life of Cicero. N.Y.: Harper&Brothers, 1881. 109p.516. Udehn L. Cicero: Persons and Positions // Sociological Insights ofGreat Thinkers: Sociology through Literature, Philosophy, and Science / Ed.by C. Edling, J. Rydgren. Santa Barbara, 2011. P. 124.517. van Buren A.W. The Palimpsest of Cicero De re publica //Supplementary Papers of the American School of Classical Studies in Rome.N.Y., 1908. P.
84–262.518. Van Dijk T. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London:Sage, 1998. P. 191–312.519. Vasaly A. Representations: Images of the World in CiceronianOratory. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. XII, 301 p.520. Waerdt P.A. The Socratic Movement. N.Y., 1994.521. Waldstein W. Naturrecht bei den klassischen römischen Juristen// Gedächtnisschrift für R. Marcic. B., 1983. S. 239–253.522. Wallace R.
An Introduction to Wall Inscriptions from Pompeii andHerculaneum. Chicago, 2005.523. Wallace-Hadrill A. Patronage in Ancient Society. L., 1989.524. Ward A.M. How Democratic Was the Roman Republic? // NewEngland Classical Journal. 2004. Vol. 31. Р. 109–119.525. Westermann W. The Slave Systems of Greek and RomanAntiquity. Philadelphia, 1984.526. Wilkin R. Eternal Lawyer: A Legal Biography of Cicero.
N.Y., 1947.400527. Wilkinson L.P. Cicero and the Relationship of Oratory toLiterature // The Cambridge History of Classical Literature: Latin Literature.The Late Republic. Cambr.: Cambridge University Press, 1983. Р. 56.528. Wilks M. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages:The Papal Monarchy with Augustinus Triumphus and the Publicists. Cambr.:Cambridge University Press, 2008.529. Williams J.D. An Introduction to Classical Rhetoric: EssentialReadings. Chichester, 2009.530. Wiseman T.P. New Men in the Roman Senate 139 B.C.–A.D.
14.Oxf.: Oxford University Press, 1971. XII, 326 p.531. Wiseman T.P. Remembering the Roman People. Essays on LateRepublican Politics and Literature. Oxf.; N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2009.282 p.532. Wissowa G. Religion und Kultus der Römer. München, 1912.533. Wood N. Cicero’s Social and Political Thought. Berkeley; LosAngeles: University of California Press, 1988.534. Wood N. Reflections on Political Theory: A Voice of Reason fromthe Past.
Palgrave, 2002.535. Wood N. The Politics of Locke’s Philosophy: A Social Study of “AnEssay Concerning Human Understanding”. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Universityof California Press, 1983.536. Woolf R. Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. London;New York: Routledge, 2015.537. Wooten C. Cicero and Quintilian on the Style of Demosthenes //Rhetorica.
1997. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 177–192.538. Wordsworth C. Inscriptiones Pompeianae. Londinii, 1838.539. Yack B. The Problems of a Political Animal: Community, Justice,and Conflict in Aristotelian Political Thought. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press, 1993. IX, 309 p.401540. Yakobson A. Petitio and largitio: Popular Participation in theCenturiate Assembly of the late Republic // JRS. 1992. Vol.
82. Р. 32–52.541. Yakobson A. Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in thePolitical System of the Late Republic. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1999.257 p.542. Yakobson A. The People’s Voice and the Speakers’ Platform:Popular Power, Persuasion and Manipulation in the Roman Forum // SCI.2004. Vol.
23. P. 201–212.543. Załęski P.S. Neoliberalizm i społeczeństwo obywatelskie. Toruń:Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2012.544. Zerba M. Love, Envy, and Pantomimic Morality in Cicero’s “Deoratore” // CPh. 2002. Vol. 97. No. 4. P. 299–321..
