Резюме (Experimental study of several core concepts of theoretical morphology (on the material of russian) - regularity, syncretism, markedness), страница 11

Spatiotemporal maps of past-tense verbinflection // Neuroimage. Vol. 19. 2003. P. 91–100.Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., Phillips, C. Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora:Experimental and modeling evidence // Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 69. 2013. P. 85–103.Dominguez, A., Cuetos, F., Segui, J. Morphological processing in word recognition: A review with particularreference to Spanish data // Psicológica. Vol.

21. 2000. P. 375–401.Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., Carreiras, M. EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish wordproperties // Behavior Research Methods. Vol. 45. 2013. P. 1246–1258.Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L. P. C., Brysbaert, M. WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonwordgeneration in Dutch, English, German, and French // Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.Vol. 36. 2004.

P. 488–499.Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Bock, K. Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production //Psychological Review. Vol. 112. 2005. P. 531–559.Fayol, M., Largy, P., Lemaire, P. When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors: A study inFrench written language // Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 47. 1994. P.

437–464.Francis, W. N. Proximity concord in English // Journal of English Linguistics. Vol. 19. 1986. P. 309–317.Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., Rizzi, L. Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction //Cognition. Vol. 101. 2006. P. 173–216.Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., Frauenfelder, U. H. The interplay of syntax and form insentence production: a cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement // Language and Cognitive Processes.Vol. 23. 2008.

P. 329–374.Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Nicol, J. Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactichierarchy // Language and Cognitive Processes. Vol. 17. 2002. P. 371–404.Frazier, L., Flores d’Arcais, G. B. Filler-driven parsing: a study of gap-filling in Dutch // Journal of Memory andLanguage.

Vol. 28. 1989. P. 331–344.Giraudo, H., Grainger, J. Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphologicalpriming // Language and Cognitive Processes. Vol. 15. 2000. P. 421–444.Gollan, T.H., Frost, R. Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew // Journal of PsycholinguisticResearch. Vol. 30. 2001. P. 627–651.Gor, K. The rules and probabilities model of native and second language morphological processing. St. Petersburg:St. Petersburg University Press, 2003.Gor, K., Chernigovskaya, T.

Rules in the processing of Russian verbal morphology // Current Issues in FormalSlavic Linguistics / ed. G. Zybatow, U. Junghanns, G. Mehlhorn, L. Szucsich. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang,2001. P. 528–536.Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, K., Kikstra, G. M. Morphophonological influences on the constructionof subject-verb agreement // Memory and Cognition.

Vol. 31. 2003. P. 1316–1326.44Haspelmath, M. Against markedness (and what to replace it with) // Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 42. 2006. P. 25–70.Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., Kliegl, R. dlexDB — einelexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung // Psychologische Rundschau.

Vol. 62.2011. P. 10–20.Hyönä, J., Hujanen, H. Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish: an eye fixationanalysis // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A Human Experimental Psychology. Vol. 50A.1997. P. 841–858.Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Hagoort, P., Herzog, H., Sach, M., Seitz, R. A PET study of cerebral activation patternsinduced by verb inflection // Neuroimage. Vol. 5. 1997.

P. S548.Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Van Valin, R. D., Jr., Murphy, B. W., Khalak, H. G. A positronemission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English // Language. Vol. 72. 1996.P. 451–497.Jakobson, R. O. Russian conjugation // Word. Vol. 4. 1948. P. 155–167.Janssen, B.E.

The acquisition of gender and case in Polish and Russian: A study of monolingual and bilingualchildren. Amsterdam: Pegasus, 2016.Jespersen, O. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin, 1924.Joanisse, M. F., Seidenberg, M. S. Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions duringregular and irregular past-tense processing // Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Vol. 5. 2005.P. 282–296.Kaiser, E., Trueswell, J. C. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language //Cognition. Vol. 94. 2004. P. 113–147.Kireev, M.V., Slioussar, N., Korotkov, A.D., Chernigovskaya, T.V., Medvedev, S.V. Changes in functionalconnectivity within the fronto-temporal brain network induced by regular and irregular Russian verb production //Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Vol.

9. Art. 36. 2015. P. 1–10.Kramer, R. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Lavric, A., Pizzagalli, D., Forstmeier, S., Rippon, G. A double-dissociation of English past-tense productionrevealed by event-related potentials and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) // ClinicalNeurophysiology. Vol. 112. 2001. P. 1833–1849.Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval //Cognitive Science. Vol. 29.

2005. P. 375–419.Lorimor, H., Bock, K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A., Beard, R. Agreement and attraction in Russian // Language andCognitive Processes. Vol. 23. 2008. P. 769–799.MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J. Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model //Cognition. Vol. 40. 1991. P. 121–157.Magomedova, V., Slioussar, N.

Stem-final consonant mutations in modern Russian // Formal Approaches to SlavicLinguistics: The New York Meeting 2015 / ed. by Y. Oseki et al. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications,2017. P. 239–259.Mannelis, L., Tharp, D. The processing of affixed words // Memory and Cognition. Vol. 5. 1977. P. 690–695.Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., Shook, A. CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource forPhonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities // PLoS ONE. Vol. 7. 2012.

e43230.Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K. Dissociating types of mental computation // Nature. Vol. 387. 1997. P. 592–594.Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K. Rules, representations, and the English past tense // Trends in CognitiveSciences. Vol. 2. 1998. P. 428–435.Martin, A. E., Nieuwland, M. S., Carreiras, M. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammaticalsentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis. Brain and Language.

Vol. 135. 2014. P. 42–51.McClelland, J. L., Patterson, K. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? //Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 6. 2002. P. 465–472.45McCreight, K., Chvany, C. Geometric representation of paradigms in a modular theory of grammar // Paradigms:The Economy of Inflection / ed. by F. Plank. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991. P. 91–112.Miyamoto, E., Takahashi, S. Sources of difficulty in processing scrambling in Japanese // Sentence processing inEast-Asian languages / Ed. by M.

Nakayama. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2002. P. 167–188.Müller, G. Syncretism without underspecification: The role of leading forms // Word Structure. Vol. 4. 2011.P. 53–103.Münte, T. F., Say, T., Clahsen, H., Schiltz, K., Kutas, M. Decomposition of morphologically complex words inEnglish: Evidence from event-related brain potentials // Cognitive Brain Research.

Vol. 7. 1999. P. 241–253.Nevins, A. Marked triggers vs. marked targets and impoverishment of the dual // Linguistic Inquiry. Vol. 42. 2011.P. 413–444.
New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., Ferrand, L. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior ResearchMethods, Instruments, & Computers. Vol. 36. 2004. P. 516–524.Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., Neville, H. J. An ERP study of regular and irregularEnglish past tense inflection // NeuroImage. Vol.

34. 2007. P. 435–445.Oh, T. M., Tan, K. L., Ng, P., Berne, Y. I., Graham, S. The past tense debate: is phonological complexity the keyto the puzzle? // Neuroimage. Vol. 57. 2011. P. 271–280.Orsolini, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Universals in morphological representation: evidence from Italian //Language and Cognitive Processes. Vol. 12. 1997. P.

1–47.Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., Bock, K. Agreement processes in sentence comprehension // Journal ofMemory and Language. Vol. 41. 1999. P. 427–456.Pinker, S. Rules of language // Science. Vol. 253. 1991. P. 530–535.Pinker, S. Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Harper Collins, 1999.Pinker, S., Prince, A.

On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model oflanguage acquisition // Cognition. Vol. 28. 1988. P. 73–193.Plunkett, K., Marchman, V. From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children andconnectionist nets // Cognition. Vol.