Диссертация (Гражданско-правовое регулирование учёта прав на бездокументарные ценные бумаги), страница 44

Die Übertragung von Kapitalmarktpapieren nach dem US-amerikanischen Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). // Wertpapier Mitteilungen. 2008.N12 (526).11Donald David C. Securities settlement systems. Handbook of Key GlobalFinancial Markets, Institutions and Infrastructure. Hong Kong, 2013.12Donald David C. The rise and effects of the indirect holding system: howcorporate America ceded its shareholders to intermediaries.Institute for law andfinance, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet. FrankfurtWorking paper series № 6809/200713Dong Ju Song. The laws of securities lawyering after sarbanes-oxley.

Dukelaw journal. Vol. 53:25714Ellinger E.P., Lomnicka E., Hare C.Ellinger's Modern Banking Law.Oxford, 2011.15France Drummond. Intermediated securities: reflections on a new concept inFrench financial markets law. Law and Financial Markets Review. 2007, N 5.18516Garcimartin F., Guillaume F. (ed. by T. Keijser). Conflict of law Rules.Transnational securities law. Oxford University Press, 201417Goode R. Goode on Legal Problems of Credit and Security. 5th ed. London.18Grotius H.

The Introduction to Dutch Jurisprudence. Rendered Into English2013by Charles Herbert. London, 1845.19Günter H. Roth. Grundriss des österreichischen Wertpapierrechts// von 2.Auflage, Wien, 1999.20Haentjens, Matthias: Harmonisation of securities law. - Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law Internat., 2007.21Hausmann Y., Bechtold-Orth E. European Business Organization LawReview. Corporate governance: is Switzerland outpacing Europe? A comparative legalanalysis of current developments, 2013.22Hillman Robert W. Cross-border investment, conflicts of laws, and theprivatization of securities law/ Law and contemporary problems. Vol.55 No 4.23Hixson K. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Under the Third Restatement ofForeign Relations Law of the United States.

Fordham International Law Journal.Volume 12, Issue 1, 1988. Article 6.24Holzhammer R. Allgemeines Handelsrecht und Wertpapierrecht//Springer,25Johansson E. Property Rights in Investment Securities and the Doctrine of1995.Specificity. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2009. 220 p.26Koens, Kumiko and Mooney, Charles W. Jr., «Security Interests in Book-Entry Securities in Japan: Should Japanese Law Embrace Perfection by ControlAgreement and Security Interests in Securities Accounts?» (2016). FacultyScholarship.Paper1636.URL:http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/16327Kronke H.

The Draft Unidroit Convention on Intermediated Securities:Transactional Certainty and Market Stability. Seminar on Current Developments inMonetary and Financial Law. Washington D.C., 2006.18628Land Stephen B. Bearer or registered? Lingering issues under TEFRA. TaxLawyer, Vol. 58, No.3.29Lando Ole. New American Choice-of-Law Principles and the EuropeanConflict of Laws of Contracts // American Journal of Comparative Law. – 1982.

– Vol.30.30Latimer P., Maume P. How Should Financial Markets Be Regulated toEnsure That Information Is Provided?. In: Promoting Information in the Marketplacefor Financial Services. 2015. Springer, Cham31Lehmann, M. Finanzinstrumente: vom Wertpapier- und Sachenrecht zumRecht der unkörperlichen Vermögensgegenstände. Mohr Siebeck, 200932Liang W. Title and title conflicts in respect of intermediates securities underEnglish law. Cambridge, 2013.33Lindner M. Verbriefung von Anleihen (von der Einzelurkunde bis zurEntmaterialisierung). Seminar zu Rechtsfragen nationaler und internationaler AnleihenThema: Verbriefung von Anleihen (von der Einzelurkunde bis zur Entmaterialisierung).Leipzig.

2000.34Lütticke K.- E. Elektronische Verbriefung von Effektenrechten? Köln.198035Martinek Michael. The Seven Pillars of Wisdom in Private InternationalLaw - The German and the Swiss Experience with the Codification of Conflicts LawRules. in: Chinese Yearbook of Private International Law and Comparative Law,Peking: Law Press China, 2001, / ed. by Huang Jin.

P. 15 - 54.36Merrill Thomas W. Property and the Right to Exclude, 77 Neb. L. Rev. 199837Micheler Eva. Intermediated Securities and Legal Certainty. LSE Law,Society and Economy Working Papers 3/2014.38Micheler Eva. Property in Securities. Comparative Study. 2007.39Milman D. Revisiting the core principles of modern company law. Companylaw newsletter. 2015.40Mooney Charles W.

Jr. Law and Systems for Intermediated Securities andthe Relationship of Private Property Law toSecurities Clearance and Settlement:187United States, Japan, and the UNIDROIT Draft Convention. IMES Discussion PaperSeries 2008-E-7 May 2008.41Opitz G. Depotgesetz. Gesetz über die Verwahrung und Anschaffung vonWertpapieren vom 4.

Februar 1937: Nebst einem ausführlichen Anhang: Schrankfächerund Verwahrstücke und zahlreiche Anlagen. De Gruyter. 1955. S. 447-452.42Owen D.Products Liability Law, 3d (Hornbook Series). 3d ed. WestAcademic, 2014. p.20; Friedrich Kessler. «Products Liability» (1967). FacultyScholarship Series. Paper 2640.43Paech P.

Market needs as Paradigm: Breaking Up the Thinking on EUSecurities Law. LSE Law, Society and Economics Working Papers 11/2012. London,2012.44Penner J. The idea of property in law. Oxford, 1997, 240 р.45Piotroski, J. D. and Srinivasan, S. Regulation and Bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Flow of International Listings. Journal of Accounting Research. 200846Poole J. Casebook on contract law. 11th ed. Oxford. 201147Poznanski Bernard G.The extraterritorial exercise of jurisdiction insecurities regulation. McGill University (Canada), ProQuest Dissertations Publishing,1986. ML31310.48Rocks S. M. and Christophorou P.

L. Memorandum Regarding the UniformVersion of Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code and the Treatment of InvestmentProperty Under the Uniform Version of Article 9, with Addenda Regarding FederalBook-Entry Regulations and International Developments.49Rogers James S. Negotiability, Property, and Identity. Cardozo Law Review12, (1990): P. 471-50850Russell A. Hakes, UCC Article 8: Will the Indirect Holding of SecuritiesSurvive the Light of Day. 35 Loy. L.A. L.

Rev. 661 (2002).51Siebel Ulf. R. Rechtsfragen internationaler Anleihen. Berlin. 200652Sithian A. But The Americans Made Me Do It!: How United States v. UBSMakes The Case For Executive Exhaustation. Emory International Law Review, 2011,Vol. 25. P.681 -729.18853Stevens R.

and McFarlane B., 'Interests in Securities: Practical Problems andConceptual Solutions' in L. Gullfer and J. Payne (eds), Intermediated Securities (2009).P 34-47.54Stevens R. When and Why does Unjustified Enrichment Justify theRecognition of Proprietary Rights? (2011) 92 Boston University Law Review 919. P.922-925.55Sussman Oren.

The economics of the EU’s corporate insolvency law andthe quest for harmonization by market forces. P. 238-264.56Thévenoz Luc. Intermediated Securities, Legal Risk, and the InternationalHarmonisation of Commercial Law. Duke Law School Legal Studies, Research PaperNo. 170, 200757Thévenoz, Luc. Who Holds (Intermediated) Securities? Shareholders'Account Holders' and Nominees. Uniform Law Review - Revue de Droit Uniforme.August 2010. Vol. 15 Issue: 3-458Warren Manning Gilbert III, The Regulation Of Insider Trading In TheEuropean Community , 48 Wash.& Lee L. Rev.

1037 (1991).59Zaccaria E.C. Proprietary rights in indirectly held securities: legal risksand future challenges (Ph.D. thesis) The London School of Economics and PoliticalScience.60Zaccaria E.C. An inquiry into the meaning of possession and control overfinancial assets and the effects on third parties. Journal of corporate law studies.

2017.P. 1-28.61Абрамов А.Е. Законодательные основы фиксации прав собственностина ценные бумаги в США. Депозитариум №1 (20), 2000.62Абрамова Е.Н. Именные и обыкновенные именные ценные бумаги: оразграничении понятий // Право и экономика. 2016. N 10. С. 37 - 42.63Агапеева Е.В. Ценные бумаги как объекты гражданского оборота позаконодательству России и США // дисс. к.ю.н., М., 200664Агарков М.М.

Понятие сделки по советскому гражданскому праву.Советское государство и право. № 3-4 за 1946 г. С. 41-55.18965Агарков М.М. Учение о ценной бумаге.Т.1. М., 2002.66Агарков М.М. Ценность частного права // Правоведение. 1992. № 1. С.25 – 4167Адамова К.Р. Основные проблемы и перспективы развития учетно-расчетных институтов финансового рынка // Финансы и кредит.

2013. №47 (575).С.17-2168Амфитеатров Г.Н. Активная и пассивная легитимация при виндикациив советском праве // Научная сессия, посвященная 20-летию существованияВсесоюзного института юридических наук (1925 -1945). Тезисы докладов. - М.,1946. - С. 34-36).69Асосков А.В.

Основы коллизионного права. М. 2012.70Байбак В.В. Обязательственное требование как объект гражданскогооборота. М.: Статут, 200571Балабин М.А. Начало презентации как основной признак ценных бумаг// Сибирский юридический вестник. 2010. №3. С.40-4472Барон Ю. Система римского гражданского права. Вып. 1. Кн. 1: Общаячасть. 3-е изд. СПб., 1909. С.

184.73Барщевский А., Черкасский Б. Мемориальные счета в учете операций сценными бумагами. Депозитариум, № 9(18), ноябрь 1999.74Башкатов М.Л. Вещная концепция безналичных денежных средств.Частное право и финансовый рынок, 2011, №1.75Бевзенко Р.С.Объекты гражданских правоотношений. Учебноепособие для студентов юридических специальностей. М., 2010.76Белов В.А. Бездокументарные ценные бумаги.

М., 2011.77Белов В.А. О презентационной природе ценных бумаг и формальнойлегитима-ции их держателей / / Законы России. 2006. No 7. С. 11 —18.78Белов В.А. Ценные бумаги в российскомгражданскомправе. В 2томах, М. 2007.79Братусь Д. Институт ¨бестелесных вещей¨ в гражданском праве/Юрист. - 2004. - № 2.19080Буркова А.Ю. Изменение системы счетов номинальных держателей вРоссии // Право и экономика. 2011. N 12. С. 46 - 48.81Бутина И.Н. Бездокументарные ценные бумаги как объекты вещныхправ. Юридический мир, 2006, N 9.82Виганд В.