Диссертация (Индивидуальные особенности выбора в ситуациях различной значимости), страница 40
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Индивидуальные особенности выбора в ситуациях различной значимости". PDF-файл из архива "Индивидуальные особенности выбора в ситуациях различной значимости", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "психология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве МГУ им. Ломоносова. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с МГУ им. Ломоносова, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата психологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 40 страницы из PDF
Order in Product CustomizationDecisions: Evidence from Field Experiments // Journal of Political Economy. – 2010. – P. 104-131.266.Löckenhoff C.E. Age, Time, and Decision Making: From Processing Speed to GlobalTime Horizons // Decision Making Over the Life Span. – Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences. – 2011. – Vol. 1235. – P. 44–56.267.Lyubomirsky S., Lepper H. A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliabilityand Construct Validation // Social Indicators Research. – 1999.
– Vol. 46. – P. 137-155.268.Martin L.E., Potts G.F. Impulsivity in Decision-making: An event-related PotentialInvestigation // Personality & Individual Differences. – 2009. – Vol. 46. – No. 3. – P. 303-308.269.Mata R., Pachur T., Helversen B. von, Hertwig R., Rieskamp J., Schooler L. EcologicalRationality: A Framework for Understanding and Aiding the Aging Decision Maker // DecisionMaking Across the Life Span / S.-Ch. Li, K.
Richard Ridderinkhof, G.R. Samanez Larkin (Eds.). –Frontiers in Neuroscience. – USA: Frontiers Media SA, 2014. – P. 97-102.175270.Mather M., Schoeke A. Positive Outcomes Enhance Incidental Learning for BothYounger and Older Adults // Decision Making Across the Life Span / S.-Ch. Li, K. RichardRidderinkhof, G.R. Samanez Larkin (Eds.). – Frontiers in Neuroscience. – USA: Frontiers Media SA,2014. – P. 8-17.271.McCaffery K., Irwig L., Bossuyt P. Patient Decision Aids to Support Clinical DecisionMaking: Evaluating the Decision or the Outcomes of the Decision // Medical Decision Making. –September/October 2007. – Vol.
27. – No. 5. – P. 619-625.272.McClelland D.C. Human Motivation. – USA, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1985.273.Naqvi N., Shiv B., Bechara A. The Role of Emotion in Decision Making: A CognitiveNeuroscience Perspective // Current Directions in Psychological Science. – October 2006. – Vol. 15. –No. 5. – P. 260-264.274.Nijstad B.A. Choosing None of the Above: Persistence of Negativity after GroupDiscussion and Group Decision Refusal // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. – 2008.
– Vol. 11.– No. 4. – P. 525-538.275.Oldershaw A., Grima E., Jollant F., Richards C., Simic M., Taylor L., Schmidt U.Decision Making and Problem Solving in Adolescents Who Deliberately Self-harm // PsychologicalMedicine. – 2009. – Vol. 39. – No. 1. – P. 95-104.276.Osin E., Boniwell I. Self-Determination and Well-Being // Materials of the 4thInternational Self-Determination Theory Conference (May 13-16, 2010). – Belgium: Gent University,2010. – P. 95.277.Paivandy S., Bullock E.E., Reardon R.C., Kelly F.D. The Effects of Decision-MakingStyle and Cognitive Thought Patterns on Negative Career Thoughts // Journal of Career Assessment.
–November 2008. – Vol. 16. – No. 4. – P. 474-488.278.Paterson R.J., Neufeld R.W.J. What Are My Opinions? Influences of Choice Availabilityon Stress and the Perception of Control // Journal of Research in Personality. – 1995. – No. 29. – P.145-167.279.Prunty M., Sharpe L., Butow P., Fulcher G. The Motherhood Choice: Themes Arising inthe Decision-making Process for Women with Multiple Sclerosis // Multiple Sclerosis. – June 2008. –V. 14. – No.
5. – P. 701-704.280.Rojer M. Collective Decision-making Models Applied to Labor Negotiations in theNetherlands: A Comparison Between an Exchange Model and a Conflict Model // Rationality andSociety. – May 1999. – Vol. 11. – No. 2. – P. 207-235.281.Roswarski T.E., Murray M.D. Supervision of Students May Protect Academic Physiciansfrom Cognitive Bias: A Study of Decision Making and Multiple Treatment Alternatives in Medicine //Medical Decision Making. – March/April 2006. – Vol.
26. – No.2. – P. 154-161.176282.Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-Regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: DoesPsychology Need Choice, Self-Determination, and Will? // Journal of Personality. – 2006. – Vol. 74. –No. 6. – P. 1557-1586.283.Saka N., Gati I., Kelly K.R. Emotional and Personality-Related Aspects of Career-Decision-Making Difficulties // Journal of Career Assessment. – November 2008. – Vol. 16. – No. 4. –P. 403-424.284.Schwartz B. Choice, Freedom, and Autonomy // Meaning, Mortality, and Choice: TheSocial Psychology of Existential Concerns / P.R. Shaver & M. Miculincer (Eds.).
– USA, Washington:American Psychological Association, 2012. – P. 271-287.285.Shivapour S.K., Nguyen C.M., Cole C.A., Denburg N.L. Effects of Age, Sex, andNeuropsychological Performance on Financial Decision-Making // Decision Making Across the LifeSpan / S.-Ch. Li, K. Richard Ridderinkhof, G.R. Samanez Larkin (Eds.). – Frontiers in Neuroscience.– USA: Frontiers Media SA, 2014.
– P. 57-65.286.Sirakaya E., Sheppard A.G., McLellan R.W. Assessment of the Relationship BetweenPerceived Safety At a Vacation Site and Destination Choice Decisions: Extending the BehavioralDecision-Making Model // Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. – February 1997. – Vol. 21. –No. 2. – P. 1-10.287.Snibbe A.C., Markus H.R. You Can’t Always Get What You Want: EducationalAttainment, Agency, and Choice.
– Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. – 2005. –No. 4. – P.703-720.288.Solberg L.I., Asche S.E., Sepucha K., Thygeson N.M., Madden J.E., Morrissey L.,Kraemer K.K., Anderson L.H. Informed Choice Assistance for Women Making Uterine FibroidTreatment Decisions: A Practical Clinical Trial // Medical Decision Making. – July/August 2010. –Vol. 30. – No. 4. – P. 444-452.289.Spaniol J. Wegier P. Decisions From Experience: Adaptive Information Search andChoice in Younger and Older Adults // Decision Making Across the Life Span / S.-Ch. Li, K. RichardRidderinkhof, G.R. Samanez Larkin (Eds.).
– Frontiers in Neuroscience. – USA: Frontiers Media SA,2014. – P. 25-33.290.Stoycheva K., Lubart T. The Nature of Creative Decision Making // Decision Making:Social and Creative Dimensions / C. Allwood & M. Selart (Eds.). – Dordrecht: Kluwer AcademicPublishers, 2001. – P.
15-33.291.Vandereycken W Van., Vansteenkiste M. Let Eating Disorder Patients Decide: ProvidingChoice May Reduce Early Drop-out from Inpatient Treatment // European Eating Disorders Review. –No. 17. – 2009. – P. 177-183.177292.Voss J.F., Wolfe C.R., Lawrence J.A., Engle R.A.
From Representation to Decision: AnAnalysis of Problem Solving in International Relations // Complex Problem Solving: Principles andMechanisms / R.J. Sternberg & P.A. Frensch (Eds.). – USA, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.– P. 119-158.293.Wei-Cheng M.
Assessing Career Decision-Making Difficulties: A Cross-Cultural Study //Journal of Career Assessment. – November 2001. – Vol. 9. – No. 4. – P. 353-364.294.Whitney S.N. A New Model of Medical Decisions: Exploring the Limits of SharedDecision Making // Medical Decision Making. – July 2003. – Vol. 23. – No. 4. – P. 275-280.295.Whitney S.N., Holmes-Rovner M., Brody H., Schneider C., McCullough L.B., Volk R.J.,McGuire A.L. Beyond Shared Decision Making: An Expanded Typology of Medical Decisions //Medical Decision Making.
– September/October 2008. – Vol. 28. –No. 5. – P. 699-705.296.Wilkins E.G., Lowery J.C., Copeland L.A., Goldfarb S.L., Wren P.A., Janz N.K. Impact ofan Educational Video on Patient Decision Making in Early Breast Cancer Treatment // MedicalDecision Making. – November/December 2006. – Vol. 26. –No. 6.
– P. 589-598.297.Wills T.A., Sandy J.M., Yaeger A.M. Time Perspective and Early-onset Substance Use: AModel Based on Stress-coping Theory // Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. – 2001. – Vol.15. – No.2. – P. 118-125.298.Wilson T., Schooler J. Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality ofPreferences and Decisions // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
– No. 60. – 1991. – P. 181192.299.Wilson T., Lisle D., Schooler J., Hodjes S.D., Klaaren K.J., LaFleur S.J. IntrospectingAbout Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. –No. 19. – 1993. – P. 331-339.300.Zimbardo P.G., Boniwell I. Balancing One Time Perspective of Optimal Functioning //Positive Psychology in Practice. – Hoboken: Wiley, 2004. – P. 165-178.178.
