Диссертация (1173800), страница 42

Просмтор этого файла доступен только зарегистрированным пользователям. Но у нас супер быстрая регистрация: достаточно только электронной почты!

Текст из файла (страница 42)

International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Chapter 16. Remedies forbreach of contract. Leiden, 1976.290. Todd P. Principles of the Carriage of Goods by Sea. New York, 2016.291. Tu G. Private international law in China. Springer Science. 2016.292. Visser H. Islamic Finance: Principles and Practice. Cheltenham, 2009.293. Voitovich S.A. International Economic Organizations in the InternationalLegal Process. Leiden, 1995.294.

Zeisberger C.M. Mastering Private Equity: Transformation via VentureCapital, Minority Investments and buyouts. Glasgow, 2017.295. Ziegel J.S. New Developments in International Commercial and ConsumerLaw. Oxford, 1998.296. Wilson J.F. Carriage of Goods by Sea. Sixth edition. Harlow, 2008.7.2. Статьи297. Akaddaf F. Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for theInternational Sale of Goods (CISG) to Arab Islamic Countries: Is the CISGCompatible with Islamic Law Principles? // Pace International Law Review.

Vol. 13.2001.298. Allarousse V. A Comparative Approach to the Conflict of Characterization inPrivate International Law // Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. Vol.23. 1991.299. Al-Ammari S., Martin А.T. Arbitration in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia // TheJournal of the LCIA. Vol. 30. № 2. 2014.300. Aljazy O.

Arbitrability in Islamic law // Lebanese review of arbitration. № 16.2000.301. Allan V.L. Martins S. Application of the New York Convention in Spain andPortugal: are the courts getting it right? // International Business Law Journal. № 4.2013.209302. Angelo L. Rosa. Building Bridges: Understanding Islamic Legal Principles forIdaho’s Transactional Attorneys. The Advocate // Official Publication of the Idahostate bar. Vol. 58.

№ 11/12. 2015.303. Angelo L. Rosa. From Mecca to San Francisco. Harmonizing Shari'aCompliant Contractual Remedies with California Law // U.C. Davis Bus. LawJournal. №5. 2005.304. Badah S. The enforcement of foreign arbitral award in Kuwait. Americaninternational journal of contemporary research. № 4. 2014.305. Baniassadi M.R. Do Mandatory Rules of Public Law Limit Choice of Law ininternational Commercial Arbitration // Berkeley journal of international law.

Vol.10. Issue 1. 1992.306. Baron P. The doctrine of penalties and the test of commercial justification //UWA Law Review. № 34. 2008.307. Bischof E. The influence of Islam on banking and finance // Internationalcompany and commercial law review. № 24 (10).

2013.308. Bremer N. Liquidated Damages under the Law of the United Arab EmiratesanditsInterpretationbyUAECourts//URL:http://www.alexander-partner.com/fileadmin/downloads/alexander-partner_gair-mitteilungen_2015_nb.pdf.309. Brown N., Lombardi С. Do Constitutions Requiring Adherence to Shari‘aThreaten Human Rights? How Egypt’s Constitutional Court Reconciles Islamic Lawwith the Liberal Rule of Law // American University International Law Review.

Vol.21. 2006.310. Brown N., Lombardi С. SCC case № 8 of judicial year 17 (May 18, 1996). AnAnnotated translation // American University International Law Review. Vol. 21.2006.311. Buzard D. U.S. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Country Injunctiveand Specific Performance Decrees // California western international law journal.Vol. 20. 1989.312. Browder D. Liquidated damages in Montana // Montana law review. Vol. 67.Issue 2. 2006.210313. Calleros C. Punitive damages, liquidated damages and clause penales incontract actions // Brookline journal of international law.

Vol. 32:1. 2006.314. Courtney W. The Nature of Contractual Indemnities. Journal of Contract Law.Vol. 27. No. 1. 2011.315. Draetta U., Lake R.B. Liquidated damages and penalty clause in internationaltrade practice // International Business Law Journal. Vol. 3. 1993.316. Faber D., Schuijling B.

Financial Leasing and Its Unification by Unidroit //Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. Vol. 14.3. 2010.317. Fenton J.P. Liquidated damages as prima facie evidence // Indiana LawJournal. Vol. 51. Issue 1. 1975.318. Frimpong Oppong R. Canadian Courts Enforce Foreign Non-MoneyJudgments // The Modern Law Review. Vol. 70. Issue 4. 2007.319.

Gebauer M. Uniform Law, General Principles and Autonomous Interpretation// Uniform Law Review. № 4. 2000.320. Graves J. Penalty clauses remedies: exploring comparative approaches toenforceability // Touro law review. Vol. 29. № 3. 2013.321. Grose M., Shlah R. Construction Law in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates:Key Differences. Turkish commercial law review. Vol. 1. № 3. 2015.322. Gotanda J.Y. Awarding Interest in International Arbitration. // URL:https://www.trans-lex.org/123400.323. Hachem P. Fixed Sums in CISG Contracts // Vindobona Journal ofInternational Commercial Law & Arbitration. № 1.

2009.324. Hanif M. Differences and Similarities in Islamic and Conventional Banking //International Journal of Business and Social Science. Vol. 2. № 2. 2011.325. Hatzis A.N. Having the cake and eating it too: efficient penalty clauses inCommon and Civil contract law // International review of law and economic. №22.2003.326. Hoecke M.V. Methodology of Comparative Legal Research // Law andMethod. №12.

2015.211327. Ignacio M.G. Enforcement of Penalty Clauses in Civil and Common Law: APuzzle to be Solved by the Contracting Parties // European Journal of Legal Studies.Vol. 5. Issue 1. 2012.328. Jabbar S.A. Islamic finance and dispute resolution // Company lawyer. №35(3). 2013.329. Jaluzot B. Méthodologie du droit comparé // Revue internationale de droitcomparé. №1. 2005.330.

Judek P. Liquidated damages for delay in the CMR Convention – Polish courtjudgment//URL:http://www.transportoweprawo.pl/2012/kary-umowne-za-opoznienie-w-konwencji-cmr-wyrok-polskiego-sadu?lang=en#comment-259011/(дата обращения: 05.11.2017).331. Koehnen M. Vaz.

N. The recognition and enforcement of foreign judgementsinCanada//URL:https://mcmillan.ca/Files/The%20Recognition%20and%20Enforcement%20of%20Foreign%20Judgements_Koehnen_0202.pdf.332. Knofel S. Mandatory rules and choice of law: a comparative approach toArticle 7(2) of the Rome Convention // Journal of business law. 1999.333. Kronke H. Financial Leasing and its Unification by UNIDROIT – GeneralReport // Ref. Dr. Unif. 2011.334. Lahlou Y. Matousekova M. Chronicle of private international law applied tobusiness // International business law journal. № 2. 2009.335. Licup L.D. A comparative study on penalty under civil law // Philippine lawjournal. Vol. 5.

№ 4. 2002.336. MacLean J. Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje: Canadian Law and the New GlobalEconomic and Environmental Realities // Canadian Business Law Journal. Vol. 57.2016.337. Macneil I.R. Power of contract and agreed remedies // Cornell law Review.Vol. 47. Issue 4. 1962.338. Majid F., Majid S. Application Of Islamic Law In The Middle East //International construction law review.

Vol. 20. 2003.212339. Marin Garcia I. Enforcement of the penalty clauses in Civil and Common law:a puzzle to be solved by the contracting parties // European journal of legal studies.Vol. 5. Issue 1. 2012.340. Michael Polonsky. Particular issues affecting the recognition and enforcementof U.S.

judgements // NYSBA International law practicum. Vol. 19. № 2. 2006.341. Mohamad A.M. Ismail. Globalization and Liquidated Damages in the AngloAmerican Jurisdictions // Al Qanoniya law Journal. Vol. 1. 2014.342. Nordin E. The penalty clause bias // Maastricht journal. Vol. 1. № 21. 2014.343. Palmer J. Implication of the new rule against penalties // WUVLR. № 47.2016.344. Pham K.

Enforcement of non-monetary foreign judgements in Australia //Sydney law review. Vol. 30:663. 2008.345. Rheinstein M. Comparative law – it’s functions, methods and usage //Arkansas law review and bar association journal. Vol. 22. №3. 1968.346. Schwartz A. The case of specific performance // The Yale law journal. Vol.89:271. 1979.347. Shalev G. Herman. S. A source study of Israel’s contract codification //Louisiana law review. Vol.

35. № 5. 1975.348. Shiffrin S.V. Remedial clauses: the overprivatisation of private law // Hastingslaw journal. Vol. 67:407. 2016.349. Solórzano J.S. An uncertain penalty: a look at the international community’sinability to harmonize the law of liquidated damage and penalty clauses // Law andbusiness review of Americas.

Характеристики

Список файлов диссертации