Диссертация (1140515), страница 14
Текст из файла (страница 14)
– 2006. – Vol. 30. – №. 3. – P. 391-397.46. Kanematsu M., Goshima S., Kawai N. et al. Low-iodine-load and low-tube-voltageCT angiographic imaging of the kidney by using bolus tracking with saline flushing//Radiology. – 2014. – Vol. 275. – №. 3. – P. 832-840.47. Kanematsu M., Goshima S., Miyoshi T. et al. Whole-body CT angiography withlow tube voltage and low-concentration contrast material to reduce radiation dose andiodine load //American Journal of Roentgenology.
– 2014. – Vol. 202. – №. 1. – P. W106W11648. Khawaja R.D.A., Singh S., Blake M. et al. Ultra-low dose abdominal MDCT: usinga knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction technique for substantial dosereduction in a prospective clinical study //European journal of radiology. – 2015. – Vol.84. – №. 1. – P. 2-10.49. Kondratyev E., Karmazanovsky G. Low radiation dose 256-MDCT angiographyof the carotid arteries: effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction technique on noise,artifacts, and image quality //European journal of radiology.
– 2013. – Vol. 82. – №. 12.– P. 2233-2239.9550. Lambert L., Ourednicek P., Jahoda J. et al. Model-based vs hybrid iterativereconstruction technique in ultralow-dose submillisievert CT colonography //The Britishjournal of radiology. – 2015. – Vol. 88. – №. 1048. – P. 20140667.51. Little M. P., Wakeford R., Tawn E.J.
et al. Risks associated with low doses andlow dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do//Radiology. – 2009. – Vol. 251. – №. 1. – P. 6-12.52. Lubner M. G., Pickhardt P.J., Kim D.H. et al. Prospective evaluation of prior imageconstrained compressed sensing (PICCS) algorithm in abdominal CT: a comparison ofreduced dose with standard dose imaging //Abdominal imaging. – 2015. – Vol. 40. – №.1.
– P. 207-221.53. Marin D., Choudhury K.R., Gupta R.T. et al. Clinical impact of an adaptivestatistical iterative reconstruction algorithm for detection of hypervascular liver tumoursusing a low tube voltage, high tube current MDCT technique //European radiology. –2013. – Vol. 23. – №. 12. – P. 3325-3335.54. Marin D., Nelson R.C., Barnhart H. et al. Detection of pancreatic tumors, imagequality, and radiation dose during the pancreatic parenchymal phase: effect of a low-tubevoltage, high-tube-current CT technique—preliminary results //Radiology.
– 2010. – Vol.256. – №. 2. – P. 450-459.55. Marin D., Nelson R.C., Samei E. et al. Hypervascular liver tumors: low tubevoltage, high tube current multidetector CT during late hepatic arterial phase fordetection—initial clinical experience //Radiology. – 2009. – Vol. 251. – №. 3. – P. 771779.56. Marin D., Nelson R.C., Schindera S.T. et al. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-currentmultidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose withadaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience//Radiology. – 2010. – Vol. 254. – №.
1. – P. 145-153.57. Menzel H., Schibilla H., Teunen D. European guidelines on quality criteria forcomputed tomography //Luxembourg: European Commission. – 2000. – Vol. 16262.58. Mettler Jr F. A., Bhargavan M., Faulkner K. et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicinestudies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparisonwith other radiation sources—1950–2007 //Radiology. – 2009. – Vol. 253. – №.
2. – P.520-531.59. Millon D., Vlassenbroek A., Van Maanen A.G. et al. Low contrast detectabilityand spatial resolution with model-based Iterative reconstructions of MDCT images: aphantom and cadaveric study //European radiology. – 2017. – Vol. 27. – №. 3. – P. 927937.60. Nakaura T., Awai K., Maruyama N. et al. Abdominal dynamic CT in patients withrenal dysfunction: contrast agent dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube96current–time product settings at 256–detector row CT //Radiology.
– 2011. – Vol. 261. –№. 2. – P. 467-476.61. Nakaura T., Nakamura S., Maruyama N. et al. Low contrast agent and radiationdose protocol for hepatic dynamic CT of thin adults at 256–detector row CT: effect oflow tube voltage and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality//Radiology. – 2012. – Vol. 264. – №. 2. – P. 445-454.62. Nakayama Y., Awai K., Funama Y. et al. Lower tube voltage reduces contrastmaterial and radiation doses on 16-MDCT aortography //American Journal ofRoentgenology.
– 2006. – Vol. 187. – №. 5. – P. W490-W49763. Namimoto T., Oda S., Utsunomiya D. et al. Improvement of Image Quality at Low–Radiation Dose and Low–Contrast Material Dose Abdominal CT in Patients WithCirrhosis: Intraindividual Comparison of Low Tube Voltage With IterativeReconstruction Algorithm and Standard Tube Voltage //Journal of computer assistedtomography.
– 2012. – Vol. 36. – №. 4. – P. 495-501.64. National Research Council et al. Health risks from exposure to low levels ofionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. – National Academies Press, 2006. – Vol. 7.65. Newhouse J. H., Kho D., Rao Q.A. et al. Frequency of serum creatinine changes inthe absence of iodinated contrast material: implications for studies of contrastnephrotoxicity //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2008. – Vol. 191. – №. 2.
– P.376-38266. Noda Y., Kanematsu M., Goshima S. et al. Reducing iodine load in hepatic CT forpatients with chronic liver disease with a combination of low-tube-voltage and adaptivestatistical iterative reconstruction //European journal of radiology. – 2015. – Vol. 84. –№. 1. – P. 11-18.67. Noda Y., Kanematsu M., Goshima S. et al. Reduction of iodine load in CT imagingof pancreas acquired with low tube voltage and an adaptive statistical iterativereconstruction technique //Journal of computer assisted tomography. – 2014. – Vol. 38. –№.
5. – P. 714-72068. O'Daniel J. C., Stevens D. M., Cody D. D. Reducing radiation exposure fromsurvey CT scans //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2005. – Vol. 185. – №. 2. – P.509-515.69. Padole A., Ali Khawaja R.D., Kalra M.K. et al. CT radiation dose and iterativereconstruction techniques //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2015. – Vol. 204. –№. 4.
– P. W384-W392.70. Patino M., Fuentes J.M., Hayano K. A et al. A quantitative comparison of noisereduction across five commercial (hybrid and model-based) iterative reconstructiontechniques: an anthropomorphic phantom study //American Journal of Roentgenology. –2015. – Vol.
204. – №. 2. – P. W176-W183.9771. Patino M., Fuentes J.M., Singh S. et al. Iterative reconstruction techniques inabdominopelvic CT: technical concepts and clinical implementation //American Journalof Roentgenology. – 2015. – Vol. 205. – №. 1. – P. W19-W31.72. Pierce D. A., Preston D. L. Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses amongatomic bomb survivors //Radiation research. – 2000. – Vol. 154.
– №. 2. – P. 178-186.73. Pourjabbar S., Singh S., Kulkarni N. et al. Dose reduction for chest CT: comparisonof two iterative reconstruction techniques //Acta Radiologica. – 2015. – Vol. 56. – №. 6.– P. 688-695.74. Pregler B., Beyer L.P., Teufel A. et al.
Low Tube Voltage Liver MDCT withSinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstructions for the Detection of HepatocellularCarcinoma //Scientific reports. – 2017. – Vol. 7. – №. 1. – P. 9460.75. Preston D. L., Ron E., Tokuoka S. et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bombsurvivors: 1958–1998 //Radiation research. – 2007. – Vol. 168. – №. 1. – P. 1-64.76. Prokesch R.W., Chow L.C., Beaulieu C.F. et al. Isoattenuating pancreaticadenocarcinoma at multi-detector row CT: secondary signs //Radiology.
– 2002.– Vol.224. – P. 764–76877. Sagara Y., Hara A.K., Pavlicek W. et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-doseCT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filteredback projection in 53 patients //American Journal of Roentgenology.
– 2010. – Vol. 195.– №. 3. – P. 713-719.78. Schindera S. T., Nelson R.C., Toth T.L. et al. Effect of patient size on radiationdose for abdominal MDCT with automatic tube current modulation: phantom study//American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2008. – Vol. 190. – №. 2. – P. W100-W105.79. Schindera S. T., Nelson R.C., Mukundan S. Jr. et al. Hypervascular liver tumors:low tube voltage, high tube current multi–detector row CT for enhanced detection—phantom study //Radiology. – 2008.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
