Диссертация (1139964), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
№ 12 (42). C. 1569–1574.90. Pachler J., Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer,with or without permanent colostomy. // The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.2012. (12). C. CD004323.91. Park J.J. [и др.]. Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience.// Diseases of the colon and rectum. 1999. № 12 (42). C. 1575–1580.92. Pas M.H. van der [и др.]. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer(COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.
// The Lancet.Oncology. 2013. № 3 (14). C. 210–218.93. Paty P.B. [и др.]. Long-term functional results of coloanal anastomosis forrectal cancer. // American journal of surgery. 1994. № 1 (167). C. 90–95.94. Paun B.C. [и др.]. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectalcancer. // Annals of surgery.
2010. № 5 (251). C. 807–818.95. Peeters K.C.M.J. [и др.]. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after totalmesorectal excision of rectal cancer. // The British journal of surgery. 2005. № 2 (92). C.211–216.96. Penna M. [и др.]. Four anastomotic techniques following transanal totalmesorectal excision (TaTME) // Techniques in Coloproctology.
2016. № 3 (20). C. 185–191.97. Phatak U.R. [и др.]. Impact of ileostomy-related complications on themultidisciplinary treatment of rectal cancer // Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2014. № 2(21). C. 507–512.98. Polovinkin V. V [и др.]. [Early complications after surgery for middle- andlower-ampullar cancer: total mesorectumectomy or «blind» preparation of rectum?]. //Khirurgiia.
2014. № 11. C. 26–33.99. Ptok H. [и др.]. Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome afterrectal cancer resection // British Journal of Surgery. 2007. № 12 (94). C. 1548–1554.140100. Rahbari N.N. [и др.]. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage followinganterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of RectalCancer. // Surgery. 2010. № 3 (147). C.
339–351.101. Raimes S.A., Mathew V. V., Devlin H.B. Temporary loop ileostomy // Journalof the Royal Society of Medicine. 1984. № 9 (77). C. 738–741.102. Rimonda R. [и др.]. TransAnal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) withSILS port versus Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM): a comparativeexperimental study. // Surgical endoscopy. 2013. № 10 (27). C. 3762–3768.103. Robertson I. [и др.]. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. //Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of GreatBritain and Ireland. 2005. № 3 (7).
C. 279–285.104. Robertson J. [и др.]. Cost analysis of early versus delayed loop ileostomyclosure: a case-matched study. // Digestive surgery. 2015. № 3 (32). C. 166–172.105. Robertson J.P. [и др.]. Early closure of temporary loop ileostomies: asystematic review. // Ostomy/wound management. 2015. № 5 (61). C. 50–57.106. Rondelli F. [и др.]. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversionafter colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: A meta-analysis // International Journal ofColorectal Disease. 2009. № 5 (24).
C. 479–488.107. Rondelli F. [и др.]. Temporary percutaneous ileostomy versus conventionalloop ileostomy in mechanical extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: a retrospectivestudy. // European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society ofSurgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. 2012. № 11 (38).C. 1065–1070.108. Rullier E. [и др.]. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioninglow anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery // World Journal of Surgery. 2001.
№ 3(25). C. 274–277.109. Rutegard M., Rutegard J. Anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Therole of blood perfusion. // World journal of gastrointestinal surgery. 2015. № 11 (7). C.289–292.110. Rybakov E.G. [и др.]. Side-to-end vs. straight stapled colorectal anastomosis141after low anterior resection: results of randomized clinical trial. // International journal ofcolorectal disease. 2016. № 8 (31).
C. 1419–1426.111. Sakai Y. [и др.]. Temporary transverse colostomy vs loop ileostomy indiversion: A case-matched study // Archives of Surgery. 2001. № 3 (136). C. 338–342.112. Seo S.I. [и др.]. The role of diverting stoma after an ultra-low anteriorresection for rectal cancer // Annals of Coloproctology. 2013. № 2 (29). C. 66–71.113. Shellito P.C. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. // Diseases of thecolon and rectum. 1998.
№ 12 (41). C. 1562–1572.114. Shiomi A. [и др.]. Diverting stoma in rectal cancer surgery. A retrospectivestudy of 329 patients from Japanese cancer centers. // International journal of colorectaldisease. 2011. № 1 (26). C. 79–87.115. Siegel R. [и др.]. Cancer statistics, 2014. // CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.2014.
№ 1 (64). C. 9–29.116. Siegel R., Desantis C., Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. // CA: acancer journal for clinicians. 2014. № 2 (64). C. 104–117.117. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. // CA: a cancerjournal for clinicians. 2015. № 1 (65). C. 5–29.118. Sier M.F. [и др.]. Home visits as part of a new care pathway (iAID) to improvequality of care and quality of life in ostomy patients: a cluster-randomized stepped-wedgetrial. // Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology ofGreat Britain and Ireland. 2017. № 8 (19).
C. 739–749.119. Silva M.A., Ratnayake G., Deen K.I. Quality of life of stoma patients:temporary ileostomy versus colostomy. // World journal of surgery. 2003. № 4 (27). C.421–424.120. Steel R.S. et al. The ASCRS textbook of colon and rectal surgery. / et al.Steel R.S., 2016.121. Stevenson A.R.L. [и др.]. Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs openresection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: The ALaCaRT randomized clinicaltrial // JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2015. № 13 (314). C. 1356–1363.142122.
Tilney H.S. [и др.]. Comparison of outcomes following ileostomy versuscolostomy for defunctioning colorectal anastomoses. // World journal of surgery. 2007.№ 5 (31). C. 1142–1151.123. Turnbull R.B., Hawk W.A., Weakley F.L. Surgical treatment of toxicmegacolon. Ileostomy and colostomy to prepare patients for colectomy // The AmericanJournal of Surgery.
1971. № 3 (122). C. 325–331.124. Ulrich A.B. [и др.]. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: morearguments in favor. // Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2009. № 3 (52). C. 412–418.125. Watanabe T. [и др.]. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum(JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.
// International journalof clinical oncology. 2012. № 1 (17). C. 1–29.126. Waterland P. [и др.]. Defunctioning Ileostomy Reversal Rates and Reasonsfor Delayed Reversal: Does Delay Impact on Complications of Ileostomy Reversal? AStudy of 170 Defunctioning Ileostomies. // Journal of clinical medicine research. 2015.№ 9 (7). C. 685–689.127. Wick E.C.
[и др.]. Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery //Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2011. № 12 (54). C. 1475–1479.128. Wick E.C. [и др.]. Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery. //Diseases of the colon and rectum. 2011. № 12 (54). C. 1475–1479.129. Williams N.S. [и др.]. De-functioning stomas: A prospective controlled trialcomparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy // British Journal of Surgery.1986. № 7 (73). C.
566–570.130. Xie L. [и др.]. [Risk factor analysis on postoperative complications afterlaparoscopic total mesorectal excision with preventive terminal ileostomy and timing ofstoma closure in rectal cancer]. // Zhonghua wei chang wai ke za zhi = Chinese journalof gastrointestinal surgery. 2015. № 6 (18). C. 563–567.131. Zhao W.-T. [и др.]. Use of a transanal drainage tube for prevention ofanastomotic leakage and bleeding after anterior resection for rectal cancer. // Worldjournal of surgery. 2013.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
