Диссертация (1139928), страница 20
Текст из файла (страница 20)
– 2011. –Vol. 59, № 5. – P. 702-707.140.Patel, V.R. The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nervesparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / V.R. Patel // Eur. Urol. –2012. – Vol. 61, № 3. – P. 571-576.141.Piek, J. Waterjet dissection of the brain: experimental and first clinicalresults / J. Piek // J. Neurosurg. – 1998. – Vol. 89, № 5. – P. 861-864.142.Quinlan, D.M.
Cavernous nerve grafts restore erectile function indenervated rats / D.M. Quinlan, R.J. Nelson, P.C. Walsh // J. Urol. – 1991. – Vol.145, № 2. – P.380-383.143.Rabbani, F. Factors predicting recovery of erections after radicalprostatectomy / F. Rabbani // J. Urol. – 2000. – Vol. 164, № 6.
– P. 1929-1934.144.Rabbani, F. Time course of recovery of erectile function after radicalretropubic prostatectomy: does anyone recover after 2 years? / F. Rabbani // J.Sex. Med. – 2010. – Vol. 7, № 12. – P. 3984-3990.145.Rassweiler, J. Anatomic nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:comparison of retrograde and antegrade techniques / J. Rassweiler // Urology. –2006. – Vol. 68, № 3. – P. 587-591.146.Rassweiler, J. Intrafascial nerve-sparing laproscopic radical prostatectomy:do we really preserve relevant nerve-fibres? / J.
Rassweiler // Eur. Urol. – 2006. –Vol. 49, № 6. – P. 955-957.125 147.Rassweiler, J. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy -critical analysis of the results / J. Rassweiler // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 49, № 4.– P. 612-624.148.Rau, H.G. The use of water‐jet dissection in open and laparoscopic liverresection / H.G. Rau, A.P. Duessel, S.
Wurzbacher // HPB. – 2008. – Vol. 10, №4. – P. 275-280.149.Reis, L.O. The triple clinicopathologic features to seminal vesicle-sparingradical prostatectomy / L.O. Reis // J. Endourol. – 2010. – Vol. 24, № 9. – P.1535-1539.150.Rosen, R.C. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): amultidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction / R.C. Rosen //Urology. – 1997. – Vol. 49, № 6. – P. 822-830.151.Rosenberg, G.S. Active hydrodissection might optimize cryosurgicalablation of the prostate / G.S.
Rosenberg, K.G. Basralian // Urology. – 2010. –Vol. 76, № 4. – P. 988-991.152.Röthlisberger, R. The anatomy of the male inferior hypogastric plexus:what should we know for nerve sparing surgery / R. Röthlisberger // Clin. Anat. –2018. – № 3. – P. 1.153.Safavy, S. Effect of a smoking cessation program on sexual functionrecovery following robotic prostatectomy at Kaiser Permanente SouthernCalifornia / S. Safavy // Perm.
J. – 2017. – Vol. 21. – P. 1-5.154.Salomon, G. Importance of baseline potency rate assessment of mendiagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy /G. Salomon // J. Sex. Med. – 2009. – Vol. 6, № 2. – P. 498-504.155.Salonia, A. Baseline potency in candidates for bilateral nerve-sparingradical retropubic prostatectomy / A. Salonia // Eur. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 50, № 2.– P. 360-365.126 156.Salonia, A.
Prevention and management of postprostatectomy sexualdysfunctions. Part 1: choosing the right patient at the right time for the rightsurgery / A. Salonia // Eur. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 62, № 2. – P. 261-272.157.Salonia, A. Prevention and management of postprostatectomy sexualdysfunctions. Part 2: recovery and preservation of erectile function, sexual desire,and orgasmic function / A. Salonia // Eur. Urol.
– 2012. – Vol. 62, № 2. – P. 273286.158.Salonia, A. Remembered International Index of Erectile Function domainscores are not accurate in assessing preoperative potency in candidates forbilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy / A. Salonia // J. Sex.Med. – 2008. – Vol. 5, № 3. – P. 677-683.159.Salonia, A. Unsuccessful investigation of preoperative sexual health issuesin the prostate cancer “couple”: results of a real-life psychometric survey at amajor tertiary academic center / A. Salonia // J.
Sex. Med. – 2009. – Vol. 6, №12. – P. 3347-3355.160.Schatloff, O. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assistedradical prostatectomy / O. Schatloff // Eur. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 61, № 4. – P.796-802.161.Schover, L.R. Seeking help for erectile dysfunction after treatment forprostate cancer / L.R. Schover // Arch. Sex. Behav. – 2004. – Vol. 33, № 5. – P.443-454.162.Schroeck, F.R. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing roboticassisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy / F.R.
Schroeck //J. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 187, № 3. – P. 894-898.163.Schurr, M.O. Histologic effects of different technologies for dissection inendoscopic surgery: Nd:YAG laser, high frequency and water-jet / M.O. Schurr //Endosc. Surg. Allied Technol. – 1994. – Vol.
2, № 3. – P. 195-201.127 164.Schwartz, E.J. Sildenafil preserves intracorporeal smooth muscle afterradical retropubic prostatectomy / E.J. Schwartz, P. Wong, R.J. Graydon // J.Urol. – 2004. – Vol. 171, № 2. – P. 771-774.165.Secin, F.P. Is it necessary to remove the seminal vesicles completely atradical prostatectomy? Decision curve analysis of European Society of UrologicOncology criteria / F.P.
Secin // J. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 181, № 2. – P. 609-613.166.Sezen, S.F. FK506 binding protein 12 is expressed in rat penile innervationand upregulated after cavernous nerve injury / S.F. Sezen // Int. J. Impot. Res. –2002. – Vol. 14, № 6. – P. 506-512.167.Sezen, S.F. Immunophilin ligand FK506 is neuroprotective for penileinnervation / S.F. Sezen // Nat. Med. – 2001. – Vol. 7, № 10.
– P. 1073-1074.168.Shekarriz, B. Hydro-Jet technology in urologic surgery / B. Shekarriz //Expert Rev. Med. Devices. – 2005. – Vol. 2, № 3. – P. 287-291.169.Shekarriz, B. Nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy using hydro-jet dissection: initial experience / B. Shekarriz, J.
Upadhyay, M.A. Jewett // J.Endourol. – 2004. – Vol. 18, № 3. – P. 273-276.170.Shikanov, S. Robotic radical prostatectomy for elderly patients: Probabilityof achieving continence and potency 1 year after surgery / S. Shikanov // J. Urol.– 2010. – Vol. 183, № 5. – P. 1803-1807.171.Sidana, A. Treatment decision-making for localized prostate cancer: whatyounger men choose and why / A.
Sidana // Prostate. – 2012. – Vol. 72, № 1. – P.58-64.172.Sidorov, D.V. Total mesorectal excision with water‐jet dissection inpatients with rectal cancer: surgical and morphological aspects / D.V. Sidorov //Colorectal Dis. – 2014. – Vol. 16, № 5. – P. 182-185.173.Siena, G.
Sexual rehabilitation after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy:free-of-charge phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration improvescompliance to treatment / G. Siena // J. Sex. Med. – 2018. – Vol. 15, № 2. – P.120-123.128 174.Sivarajan, G. Ten-year outcomes of sexual function after radicalprostatectomy: results of a prospective longitudinal study / G. Sivarajan // Eur.Urol. – 2014.
– Vol. 65, № 1. – P. 58-65.175.Snyder, S.H. Neural actions of immunophilin ligands / S.H. Snyder //Trends Pharmacol. Sci. – 1998. – Vol. 19, № 1. – P. 21-26.176.Sridhar, A.N. Recovery of baseline erectile function in men followingradical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a prospective analysis usingvalidated measures / A.N. Sridhar // J. Sex. Med. – 2016. – Vol. 13, № 3. – P.435-443.177.Stanford, J.L. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy forclinically localized prostate cancer. The prostate cancer outcomes study / J.L.Stanford // JAMA. – 2000.
– Vol. 283, № 3. – P. 354-360.178.Stember, D.S. Preoperative erectile function is an independent predictor fordecision to spare cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy / D.S. Stember,C.J. Nelson, J.P. Mulhall // J. Sex. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 10, № 8. – P. 2101-2107.179.Stolzenburg, J.U. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitonealradical prostatectomy / J.U.
Stolzenburg // Eur. Urol. – 2008. – Vol. 53, № 5. – P.931-940.180.Su, L.M. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating theopen surgical technique / L.M. Su // Urology. – 2004. – Vol. 64, № 1. – P. 123127.181.Takenaka, A. Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplyingpenile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy/ A.














