Диссертация (1139928), страница 18
Текст из файла (страница 18)
– 1995. – Vol. 153, №3. – P. 1722-1727.45. Catalona, W.J. Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutiveradical retropubic prostatectomies / W.J. Catalona // J. Urol. – 1999. – Vol. 162,№ 2. – P. 433-438.46. Catalona, W.J. Return of erections and urinary continence following nervesparing radical retropubic prostatectomy / W.J. Catalona, J.W. Basler // J. Urol. –1993. – Vol. 150, № 3.
– P. 905-907.47. Clements, T. Hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundle during robot-assistedradical prostatectomy / T. Clements // J. Urol. – 2012. – Vol. 187, № 4S. – P.500.48. Costello, A.J. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosalnerves / A.J. Costello, M. Brooks, O.J. Cole // BJU Int.
– 2004. – Vol. 94, № 7. –P. 1071-1076.49. Davidson, P.J.T. Radical Prostatectomy: prospective assessment of mortality andmorbidity / P.J.T. Davidson, D. Van Den Ouden, F.H. Schröder // Eur. Urol. –1996. – Vol. 29, № 2. – P. 168-173.50. Descazeaud, A. Age difference between patient and partner is a predictive factorof potency rate following radical prostatectomy / A. Descazeaud, B.
Debre, T.A.Flam // J. Urol. – 2006. – Vol. 176, № 6. – P. 2594-2598.51. Djozic, J. The use of water jet dissection for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy /J. Djozic, J. Bogdanovic, M. Popov // Urology. – 2005. – Vol. 66, № 3. – P. 9.52. Domes, T. Clinical outcomes of intracavernosal injection in postprostatectomypatients: a single-center experience / T.
Domes // Urology. – 2012. – Vol. 79, №1. – P. 150-155.53. Dubbelman, Y.D. Penile vascular evaluation and sexual function before and afterradical retropubic prostatectomy: 5-year follow-up / Y.D. Dubbelman, M.F.Wildhagen, G.R. Dohle // Int. J. Androl. – 2008. – Vol. 31, № 5. – P. 483-489.115 54. Eastham, J.A. Predicting an optimal outcome after radical prostatectomy: the“Trifecta” nomogram / J.A. Eastham, P.T. Scardino, M.W. Kattan // J. Urol.
–2008. – Vol. 179, № 6. – P. 2207-2211.55. Erisen, L. Shoulder function after accessory nerve–sparing neck dissections / L.Erisen // Head Neck. – 2004. – Vol. 26, № 11. – P. 967–971.56. Fernandez, S. Early clinical experience with water-jet dissection (hydro-jet)during nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy / S. Fernandez // Minim.Invasive Ther.
Allied Technol. – 2002. – Vol. 11, № 5. – P. 257-264.57. Fernandez, S. Experience with water-jet dissection in nerve sparing radicalprostatectomy (NSRRP) / S. Fernandez // Eur. Urol. Suppl. – 2002. – Vol. 1, №1. – P. 3.58. Ferrini, M.G. Long-term continuous treatment with sildenafil ameliorates agingrelated erectile dysfunction and the underlying corporal fibrosis in the rat / M.G.Ferrini // Biol. Reprod. – 2007. – Vol. 76, № 5. – P. 915-923.59.
Ferrini, M.G. Vardenafil prevents fibrosis and loss of corporal smooth musclethat occurs after bilateral cavernosal nerve resection in the rat / M.G. Ferrini //Urology. – 2006. – Vol. 68, № 2. – P. 429-435.60. Ficarra, V. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: asystematic review / V. Ficarra // Eur. Urol. – 2007. – Vol. 51, № 1.
– P. 45-55.61. Ficarra, V. Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP)outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) / V. Ficarra // BJUInt. – 2013. – Vol. 112, № 3. – P. 338-345.62. Ficarra, V. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potencyrates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / V. Ficarra // Eur. Urol. – 2012. –Vol.
62, № 3. – P. 418-330.63. Fowler, F.J. Patient-reported complications and follow-up treatment after radicalprostatectomy. The national medicare experience: 1988–1990 (updated June1993) / F.J. Fowler // Urology. – 1993. – Vol. 42, № 6. – P. 622-629.116 64. Ganzer, R. Anatomical study of pelvic nerves in relation to seminal vesicles,prostate and urethral sphincter: immunohistochemical staining, computerizedplanimetry and 3-dimensional reconstruction / R. Ganzer // J. Urol. – 2015. – Vol.193, № 4. – P. 1205-1212.65.
Gargollo, P.C. Hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundles during laparoscopicradical retropubic prostatectomy: a new technique / P.C. Gargollo // J. Urol. –2004. – Vol. 171, № 4S. – P. 522.66. Gilbert, S.M. Functional outcomes following nerve sparing prostatectomyaugmented with seminal vesicle sparing compared to standard nerve sparingprostatectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial / S.M. Gilbert // J. Urol.– 2017.
– Vol. 198, № 3. – P. 600-607.67. Gilbert, S.M. Prostate cancer: Seminal vesicle sparing: a continuing trend? / S.M.Gilbert // Nat. Rev. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 6, № 9. – P. 475-476.68. Gilling, P. Aquablation – image‐guided robot‐assisted waterjet ablation of theprostate: initial clinical experience / P. Gilling // BJU Int. – 2016. – Vol. 117, №6.
– P. 923-929.69. Glickman, L. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 yearsafter radical prostatectomy / L. Glickman, G. Godoy, H. Lepor // J. Urol. – 2009.– Vol. 181, № 2. – P. 731-735.70. Glybochko, P.V. The role of water-jet dissection in improving erectile functionand urinary continence after nerve-sparing prostatectomy / P.V. Glybochko //Urologia. – 2017. – Vol. 84, № 3.
– P. 190-196.71. Grabbert, M. Long‐term functional outcome analysis in a large cohort of patientsafter radical prostatectomy / M. Grabbert // Neurourol. Urodyn. – 2018. – Vol.37. – P. 1.72. Gralnek, D. Differences in sexual function and quality of life after nerve sparingand non-nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy / D. Gralnek // J. Urol. –2000. – Vol.
163, № 4. – P. 1166-1169.117 73. Grivas, N. The value of periprostatic fascia thickness and fascia preservation asprognostic factors of erectile function after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radicalprostatectomy / N. Grivas // World J. Urol. – 2018. – P. 1-7.74.
Guru, K.A. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle duringrobot-assisted radical prostatectomy / K.A. Guru // Can. J. Urol. – 2008. – Vol.15, № 2. – P. 4000-4003.75. Harris, C.R. Men with low preoperative sexual function may benefit from nervesparing radical prostatectomy / C.R. Harris, S.
Punnen, P.R. Carroll // J. Urol. –2013. – Vol. 190, № 3. – P. 981-986.76. Hatiboglu, G. A prospective randomized controlled trial for assessment ofperineal hydrodissection technique for nervesparing robot assisted radicalprostatectomy / G. Hatiboglu // Int. J. Med. Robot. – 2017. – Vol. 13, № 4. – P.1835.77. Hatzimouratidis, K.
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in postprostatectomyerectile dysfunction: a critical analysis of the basic science rationale and clinicalapplication / K. Hatzimouratidis // Eur. Urol. – 2009. – Vol. 55, № 2. – P. 334347.78. Heidenreich, A. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis,and treatment of clinically localised disease / A. Heidenreich // Eur.
Urol. – 2011.–Vol. 59, № 1. – P. 61-71.79. Hisasue, S. Baseline erectile function alters the cavernous nerve quantity anddistribution around the prostate / S. Hisasue // J. Urol. – 2010. – Vol. 184, № 5. –P. 2062-2067.80. Hollenbeck, B.K. Determinants of long-term sexual health outcome after radicalprostatectomy measured by a validated instrument / B.K. Hollenbeck // J. Urol. –2003.
– Vol. 169, № 4. – P. 1453-1457.81. Hreha, P. Water jet technology used in medicine / P. Hreha // Tech. Gaz. – 2010.– Vol. 17, № 2. – P. 237-240.118 82. Junuzovic, D. Factors affecting erectile function after radical prostatectomy / D.Junuzovic // Med. Arh. – 2011. – Vol. 65, № 5. – P. 306-307.83. Kaul, S.
Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Instituteprostatectomy with veil of Aphrodite nerve sparing: an analysis of 154consecutive patients / S. Kaul // BJU Int. – 2006. – Vol. 97, № 3. – P. 467–472.84. Khoder, W.Y. Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques(intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a singlecentre study / W.Y. Khoder // World J.
Urol. – 2015. – Vol. 33, № 3. – P. 301307.85. Kim, D.S. Optimal timing to evaluate prediagnostic baseline erectile function inpatients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / D.S. Kim // J. Sex.Med. – 2012. – Vol. 9, № 2. – P. 602-607.86. Kim, E.D. Bilateral nerve grafts during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a oneyear follow-up / E.D. Kim // J. Urol. – 2001.
–Vol. 165, № 6. – P. 1950-1956.87. Kim, E.D. Cavernous nerve grafting restores partial erections after non-nervesparing radical retropubic prostatectomy / E.D. Kim // J. Urol. – 1999. – Vol. 161,№ 1. – P. 188-192.88. Kim, S.C. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy:robot-assisted versus retropubic / S.C.
Kim // Eur. Urol. – 2011. – Vol. 60, № 3. –P. 413-419.89. Kim, T.H. Factors predicting outcomes of penile rehabilitation with udenafil50 mg following radical prostatectomy / T.H. Kim // Int. J. Impot. Res. – 2016. –Vol. 28, № 1. – P. 25-30.90. Klotz, L. A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nervestimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing duringradical prostatectomy / L. Klotz // J. Urol. – 2000. – Vol. 164, № 5. – P. 15731578.91. Klotz, L. Early experience with intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation withpenile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical119 prostatectomy / L. Klotz, S.
Herschorn // Urology. – 1998. – Vol. 52, № 4. – P.537-542.92. Ko, W.J. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 yearfollowing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / W.J. Ko // J. Sex.Med. – 2011. – Vol. 8, № 6. – P. 1805-1812.93. Ko, W.J. Pathological confirmation of nerve‐sparing types performed duringrobot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) / W.J. Ko // BJU Int. – 2013. – Vol.111, № 3. – P. 451-458.94. Ko, Y.H.
Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radicalprostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery? / Y.H. Ko// Eur. Urol. – 2013. – Vol. 63, № 1. – P. 169-177.95. Köckerling, F. Total mesorectal excision with the water-jet-dissection. Techniqueand results / F.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
