Диссертация (1138277), страница 19
Текст из файла (страница 19)
СПб.: Наука.2003. С. 61—82.30. Яновская Е.Б. Согласованные и не зависящие от пути методыраспределения ресурсов // Экономико-математические исследования:Математические модели и информационные технологии. Часть 1. СПб.:РАН. 2005. С. 131—149.31. Aitchison J. The Statistical analysis of computational data // Journal of theRoyal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological).
1982. № 44(2), P. 139—177.14032. Aizerman M., Aleskerov F. Theory of choice. Elsevier: North-Holland,1995. 314 p.33. Aleskerov F. Arrovian Aggregation Models. Dordercht: KluwerAcademic Publishers, 1999. 242 p.34. Aleskerov F. Categories of Arrovian Voting Schemes // Handbook ofSocial Choice and Welfare.
Vol. 1. K.J. Arrow, A.K. Sen and K. SuzumuraEd. Ch. 2. 2002. P. 95—12935. Aleskerov F. Formal Analysis of the Results of Elections // Analysis andDesign of Electoral Systems. Oberwolfach Report. 2004. No. 14. P. 742—744.36. Aleskerov F., Cinar Y. ‘q-Pareto Scalar’ two-stage extremization modeland its reducibility to one stage model // Theory and Decision.
2008. № 65. P.325—338.37. Arrow K. Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press.1951. 124 p.38. Balinski M., Ramirez V. Parametric methods of apportionment, roundingand production // Mathematical Social Studies. 1999. № 37. P.
107—122.39. Balinski M., Young P. Apportionment schemes and the quota method //The American Mathematical Monthly. 1977. № 84(6). P. 450—455.40. Balinski M., Young P. Stability, Coalitions and Schism in proportionalRepresentation Systems // The American Political Science Review. 1978. №72. P. 848—858.41. Balinski M., Young P. The Jefferson method of Apportionment // SIAMReview. 1978. № 20(2). P.
278—284.42. Balinski M., Young P. Criteria for proportional Representation //Operations Research. 1979. № 27(1). P. 80—95.43. Balinski M., Young P. Fair representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man,One Vote. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982. 195 p.14144. Baron D.P., Diermeier D. Elections, Governments, and Parliaments inProportional Representation Systems // The Quarterly Journal of Economics.2001. № 116(3). P. 933—967.45. Bartholdi J.J., Orlin J.B. Single transferable vote resists strategic voting //Social Choice and Welfare. 1991. № 8(4) P. 341—354.46.
Bennett D.S., Lundie R. Australian electoral systems // Parliament ofAustralia Research paper. 2007. № 5.47. Black D. The elasticity of committee decisions with an altering size ofmajority // Econometrica. 1948. № 16. P. 262—270.48. Breton A., Galeotti G. Is proportional representation always the bestelectoral rule? // Public finance. 1985. № 40(1). P. 1—16.49.
Brown D.J. Aggregation of preferences // Quarterly Journal of Economics.1975. № 89. P. 456—469.50. Campbell K. Impossibility Theorems in the Arrovian Framework //Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Volume 1, K.J. Arrow, A.K. Senand K. Suzumura Ed. Ch. 1. 2002. P. 35—94.51. Conitzer V. Sandholm T. Complexity of Manipulating Elections with Fewcandidates // AAAI-02 Proceedings. 2002. P. 314—319.52.
Cowell F. Measurement of Inequality // London School of Economics andPolitical Science Discussion Paper. 1998. № DARP/36.53. Cox G.W. Strategic Electoral Choice in Multi-Member Districts:Approval Voting in Practice? // American Journal of Political Science. 1984.№ 28(4). P.
722—738.54. Cox G.W. Strategic Voting Equilibria Under the Single NontransferableVote // The American Political Science Review. 1994. № 88(3). P. 608—621.55. Dalton H. Measurement of the inequality of income // Economic Journal.1920. № 30. P. 348—361.56. Dasgupta P., Maskin E. On the robustness of majority rule // Journal ofthe European Economic Association.
2008. № 6(5). P. 949—973.14257. De Sinopoli F., Iannantuoni G. Some results on strategic voting andproportional representation with multidimensional policy space // UniversidadCarlos III de Madrid Working Paper. Economics Series 21. 2002. № 02-5758. De Sinopoli F., Iannantuoni G. Extreme voting under proportionalrepresentation: the multidimensional case // Universidad Carlos III de MadridWorking Paper. Economics Series 21. 2005. № 05-3459. Doron G., Kronick R. Single Transferable Vote: An Example of aPerverse Social Choice Function // American Journal of Political Science.1977. № 21(2).
P. 303—311.60. Downs A. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper andRow. 1957.61. Elections BC. Statement of votes: referendum on electoral reform, May17,2005.URL:http://www.elections.bc.ca/docs/rpt/SOV-2005-ReferendumOnElectoralReform.pdf (дата обращения: 12.02.2012).62. Elections BC. Statement of votes: referendum on electoral reform, May12,2009.URL:http://www.elections.bc.ca/docs/rpt/2009Ref/2009-Ref-SOV.pdf (дата обращения: 12.02.2012).63. Farrel D.M., McAllister I. The 1983 Change in Surplus Vote TransferProcedures for the Australian Senate and its Consequences for the SingleTransferable Vote // Australian Journal of Political Science. 2003.
№ 38(3). P.479—491.64. Geanakoplos J. Three brief proofs of Arrow’s impossibility theorem //Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper. 2004. № 1123RRRR.65. Gibbard A. Manipulation of voting schemes // Econometrica. 1973. № 41.P. 587—601.66. Gilmour J. STV Rules for Transferring Surpluses of Votes // Briefingnote.15April2004.URL:http://www.jamesgilmour.f2s.com/STVTransferRules.pdf (дата обращения:12.02.2012).14367.
Gilmour J. Detailed Description of the STV Count in Accordance Withthe Rules in the Scottish Local Government Elections Order 2007 //Representation. 2007. № 43(3). P. 217—29.68. Golman R., Page S.E. General Blotto: games of allocative strategicmismatch // Public Choice. 2009. № 138. P. 279–299.69. Grilli di Cortona P., Manzi C., Pennisi A., Ricca F., Simeone B.Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems. Philadelphia: Society forIndustrial and Applied Mathematics, 1999.
230 p.70. Heinrich L., Pukelsheim F., Schwingenschlőgl U. Sainte-Laguё’s chisquare divergence for the rounding of probabilities and its convergence to astable law // Statistics & Decisions. 2004. № 22, P. 43—59.71. Hill D.I. Miller’s example of the butterfly effect under STV // ElectoralStudies. 2008. № 27.
P. 684—686.72. Hill D.I., Warren C.H.E.. Meek versus Warren // Voting matters. 2005. №20. P. 1—5.73. Hill D.I., Wichmann B. A., Woodall D. R. Algorithm 123 — SingleTransferable Vote by Meek's Method // The Computer Journal. 1987. №30(2). P. 277—281.74. Hoag C.G., Hallett G.H. Proportional representation. New York: TheMacmillan Company, 1926. 546 p.75. Hurwicz L. On the Concept and Possibility of InformationalDecentralization // American Economic Review. 1969. № 59(2). P. 513—524.76. Inada K.I. Majority rule and rationality // Journal of Economic Theory.1970.
№ 2. P. 27—40.77. Intriligator M.D. A Probabilistic Model of Social Choice // Review ofEconomic Studies. 1973. № 40(4), P. 553—560.78. Kemp M.C. Arrow’s General Possibility Theorem // Review of EconomicStudies. 1954. № 21(3). P. 240—243.14479. Kemp M.C., Asimakopulos A.
A note on ‘Social welfare functions’ andcardinal utility // Canadian Journal of Economic and Political Science. 1952.№ 18. P. 195—200.80. Kestelman P. Apportionment and Proportionality: a measured view //Voting matters. 2005 № 20. P. 12—22.81. Koppel M., Diskin A. Measuring Disproportionality, Volatility andMalapportionment: Axiomatization and Solutions // Social Choice andWelfare. 2009. № 33. P. 281—286.82. Le Breton M., Weymark J.
Arrovian Social Choice Theory on EconomicDomains // Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare. 2011. Volume II. Ch.17. P. 191—299.83. Lijphart A. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of TwentySeven Democracies 1945-1990. Oxford University Press, 1994. 209 p.84. Local Electoral Amendment Act 2002 No 85, Public Act.
New Zealand.85. Maier S., Pukelsheim F. Bazi: A Free Computer Program for ProportionalRepresentation Apportionment // Preprint Institut für Mathematik. UniversitätAugsburg. 2007. № 042/2007.86. Maniquet F. Strategic voting in large elections under proportionalrepresentation: Why vote for center parties? 2010.
Center for EconomicStudies.K.U.Leuven.URL:http://www.econ.kuleuven.be/ces/seminars/Paper%20CES%20seminar%2007-10-10.pdf (дата обращения: 12.02.2012).87. Maskin E. The Arrow Impossibility Theorem: Where Do We Go FromHere? // Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science EconomicsWorking Papers. 2009. № 93.88. Maskin E. Nash equilibrium and welfare optimality // Review ofEconomic Studies. 1999. № 66(1).
P. 23—38.14589. Meffert M.F., Gschwend T. Strategic Voting in Multiparty Systems: AGroup Experiment // Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Rationalitätskonzepte,Entscheidungsverhalten und ökonomische Modellierung. 2008. № 08-10.90. Meek B.L. Une nouvelle approche du scrutin transfeґrable, part 1 //Matheґ matiques et sciences humaines 1969. № 25. P. 13—23.91. Meek B.L. Une nouvelle approche du scrutin transfeґrable, part 2 //Matheґmatiques et sciences humaines. 1970. № 29. P. 33—39.92. Miller N.R. The butterfly effect under STV // Electoral Studies. 2007. №26.
P. 503—506.93. Morelli M. Party Formation and Policy Outcomes under DifferentElectoral Systems // Review of Economic Studies. 2004. № 71. P. 829—853.94. Moulin H. Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing // Handbook of SocialChoice and Welfare, Volume 1, K.J. Arrow, A.K. Sen and K. Suzumura. Ed.2002. Ch. 6. P. 289—357.95. Moulin H. Fair Division and Collective Welfare, MIT Press, 2003. 289 p.96. Mudambi R., Navarra P., Nicosia C. Plurality versus proportionalrepresentation: An analysis of Sicilian election // Public Choice. 1996. № 86.P. 341—357.97.
Myerson R.M. Theoretical comparisons of electoral systems // EuropeanEconomic Review. 1999. № 43. P. 671—697.98. Myerson R.M. Fundamental theory of institutions: A lecture in honor ofLeo Hurwicz // Review of Economic Design. 2009. № 13. P. 59—75.99. New Zealand Electoral Commission. Overall Results - 2011 ReferendumontheVotingSystem.2011.URL:http://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2011/referendum.html(дата обращения: 12.02.2012).100.
Nurmi H. It’s not just the lack of monotonicity // Representation. 1996.№ 34(1). P. 48—52.146101. Nurmi H. Models of Political Economy. London and New York:Routledge, 2006. 222 p.102. Ordeshook P.C., Zeng L. Some Properties of Hare Voting with StrategicVoters // Public Choice. 1994. № 78(1). P. 87—101.103. Plott C.R.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
