Диссертация (1137866), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
The utility of annual reports: Aninternational study // Journal of International Business Studies. – 1983. – № 1(14).– P. 63–84.46.Chapple W., Moon J. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A SevenCountry Study of CSR Web Site Reporting // Business & Society. – 2005. – № 4(44).– P.
415–441.47.Chazi A. [и др.]. Technology transactions, announcement effect, and reversal:Dissecting an anomaly // The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. –2014. – № 3 (54).– P. 371–381.48.Chen G. [и др.]. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidencefrom China // Journal of Corporate Finance. – 2006. – № 3 (12).– P. 424–448.49.Chiao C. , Hung W. Stock market valuations of R&D and electronics firms duringTaiwan’s recent economic transition // The Developing Economies. – 2006.
– №1 (44).– P. 53–78.50.Christensen H.B., Hail L., Leuz– P.Capital-Market Effects of SecuritiesRegulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement // Review ofFinancial Studies. – 2016. – № 11 (29).– P. 2885–2924.51.Comerford S.
International Intellectual Property Rights and the Future of GlobalE-Sports // Brooklyn Journal of International Law. – 2011. – (37).– P. 623.52.Cooke T. E. The impact of size, stock market listing and industry type ondisclosure in the annual reports of Japanese listed corporations //Accounting andBusiness Research. – 1992. –№. 87 (22) – P.
229-237.53.Cormier D., Magnan M. Environmental reporting management: a continentalEuropean perspective // Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. – 2003. – № 1(22).– P. 43–62.12654.Čular M. Transparency of audit firms in Croatia //Special Journal Issue onAdvances in Business, Finance, Economics and Management. – 2014. – №. 3. (8)– P. 324-328.55.Cuganesan S. Reporting organisational performance in managing humanresources: Intellectual capital or stakeholder perspectives? // Journal of HumanResource Costing & Accounting. – 2006. – № 3 (10).– P. 164–188.56.Dambra M., Field L.C., Gustafson M.T. The JOBS Act and IPO volume:Evidence that disclosure costs affect the IPO decision // Journal of FinancialEconomics.
– 2015. – № 1 (116).– P. 121–143.57.Day G.S. Assessing the Effects of Information Disclosure Requirements // Journalof Marketing. – 1976. – № 2 (40).– P. 42–52.58.Dedman E. [и др.]. Voluntary disclosure and its impact on share prices: Evidencefrom the UK biotechnology sector // Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. –2008. – № 3 (27).– P.
195–216.59.Dhaliwal D. [и др.]. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost ofequity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency //Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. – 2014. – № 4 (33).– P. 328–355.60.Dhaliwal D.S. [и др.]. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of EquityCapital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting // TheAccounting Review.
– 2011. – № 1 (86).– P. 59–100.61.Diamond D.W. Optimal release of information by firms // The journal of finance.– 1985. – № 4 (40).– P. 1071–1094.62.Diamond D.W., Verrecchia R.E. Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital //The Journal of Finance. – 1991. – № 4 (46).– P. 1325–1359.63.Donelson D.C., Resutek R.J. The effect of R&D on future returns and earningsforecasts // Review of Accounting Studies.
– 2012. – № 4 (17).– P. 848–876.64.Duqi A., Mirti R., Torluccio G. An analysis of the R&D effect on stock returnsfor European listed firms // European Journal of Scientific Research. – 2011. – №4 (58).– P. 482–496.12765.Dye R.A. An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature inaccounting // Journal of Accounting and Economics. – 2001. – № 1–3 (32).– P.181–235.66.Edmunds A., Morris A. The problem of information overload in businessorganisations: a review of the literature // International Journal of InformationManagement.
– 2000. – № 1 (20).– P. 17–28.67.Einhorn E. The Nature of the Interaction between Mandatory and VoluntaryDisclosures // Journal of Accounting Research. – 2005. – № 4 (43).– P. 593–621.68.Einhorn E. Voluntary disclosure under uncertainty about the reporting objective// Journal of Accounting and Economics. – 2007. – № 2–3 (43).– P.
245–274.69.Einhorn E., Ziv A. Biased voluntary disclosure // Review of Accounting Studies.– 2012. – № 2 (17).– P. 420–442.70.Eklund J.E. Q-theory of investment and earnings retentions—evidence fromScandinavia // Empirical Economics. – 2009. – № 3 (39).– P. 793–813.71.Eng L.L., Mak Y.T. Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure // Journal ofAccounting and Public Policy. – 2003. – № 4 (22).– P. 325–345.72.Farvaque É., Refait-Alexandre– P. , Saïdane D.
Corporate disclosure: a review ofits (direct and indirect) benefits and costs, Abstract // Economie internationale. –2012. – № 128.– P. 5–31.73.Field L., Lowry M., Shu S. Does disclosure deter or trigger litigation? // Journalof Accounting and Economics. – 2005. – № 3 (39).– P. 487–507.74.Firth M. The extent of voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports and itsassociation with security risk measures // Applied Economics. – 1984. – № 2(16).– P. 269–278.75.Gandomi A., Haider M.
Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, andanalytics // International Journal of Information Management. – 2015. – № 2(35).– P. 137–144.76.García-Meca E., Sánchez-Ballesta J.P. The Association of Board Independenceand Ownership Concentration with Voluntary Disclosure: A Meta-analysis //European Accounting Review. – 2010. – № 3 (19).– P. 603–627.12877.Gennotte G., Trueman B.
The Strategic Timing of Corporate Disclosures // TheReview of Financial Studies. – 1996. – № 2 (9).– P. 665–690.78.George G., Zahra S.A., Wood D.R. The effects of business–university allianceson innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly tradedbiotechnology companies // Journal of Business Venturing. – 2002. – № 6 (17).–P. 577–609.79.Gorschek T. [и др.]. A Lightweight Innovation Process for Software-IntensiveProduct Development // IEEE Software; Los Alamitos. – 2010. – № 1 (27).– P.37–45.80.Granados N., Gupta A. Transparency Strategy: Competing with Information in aDigital World // MIS Quarterly. – 2013.
– № 2 (37).– P. 637–641.81.Haeussler– P. , Patzelt H., Zahra S.A. Strategic alliances and product developmentin high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities// Journal of Business Venturing. – 2012. – № 2 (27).– P. 217–233.82.Hagedoorn J. Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends andpatterns since 1960 // Research policy. – 2002.
– № 4 (31). – P. 477–492.83.Hagedoorn J., Wang N. Is there complementarity or substitutability betweeninternal and external R&D strategies? // Research Policy. – 2012. – № 6 (41). –P. 1072–1083.84.Hall B. H. The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980's//The American Economic Review. – 1993. – Т. 83. – №. 2. – P. 259-264.85.Hall B.H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations // RANDJournal of economics.
– 2005. – P. 16–38.86.Hall B.H., Oriani R. Does the market value R&D investment by European firms?Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy //International Journal of Industrial Organization. – 2006. – № 5 (24). – P. 971–993.87.Harrison J.S., Wicks A.C. Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance: //Business Ethics Quarterly. – 2013. – № 1 (23).
– P. 97–124.12988.Healy P.M., Palepu K.G. Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and thecapital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature // Journal ofaccounting and economics. – 2001. – № 1 (31). – P. 405–440.89.Hertzel M.G., Li Z. Behavioral and rational explanations of stock priceperformance around SEOs: Evidence from a decomposition of market-to-bookratios //Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. – 2010. –№. 4(45) – P.935-958.90.Hines R.D. The Usefulness of Annual Reports: the Anomaly between theEfficient Markets Hypothesis and Shareholder Surveys // Accounting andBusiness Research.
– 1982. – № 48 (12). – P. 296–309.91.Hirshleifer D., Teoh S.H. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financialreporting // Journal of Accounting and Economics. – 2003. – № 1–3 (36). – P.337–386.92.Hirst D.E., Koonce L., Venkataraman S. Management Earnings Forecasts: AReview and Framework // Accounting Horizons. – 2008. – № 3 (22). – P. 315–338.93.Holmen J. Intellectual Capital Reporting // Management Accounting Quarterly. –2005. – № 4 (6). – P.
1.94.Huang K.-– P. Mandatory Disclosure: A Controversial Device with No Effects //Pace L. Rev. – 2000. – (21). – P. 203.95.James S.D., Leiblein M.J., Lu S. How Firms Capture Value From TheirInnovations // Journal of Management. – 2013. – № 5 (39). – P. 1123–1155.96.James S.D., Shaver J.M. Motivations for Voluntary Public R&D Disclosures //Academy of Management Discoveries. – 2016.
– № 3 (2). – P. 290–312.97.Jensen M.C. The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–1964 // TheJournal of Finance. – 1968. – № 2 (23). – P. 389–416.98.Jensen M.C. Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the CorporateObjective Function // Business Ethics Quarterly. – 2002. – № 2 (12). – P. 235.13099.Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, AgencyCosts and Ownership Structure // Journal of Financial Economics.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
