Диссертация (1104104), страница 30
Текст из файла (страница 30)
Vol. 542. Pp. 105114.Colella P., Henderson L. The von Neumann paradox for the diraction of weak shockwaves // J. Fluid Mech. 1990. Vol. 213. Pp. 7194.Brio M., Hunter J. Mach reection for the two-dimensional Burgers equation // PhysicaD. 1992. Vol. 60. Pp. 194207.Guderley K. G. The Theory of Transonic Flow.
Pergamon, 1962.Zakharian A., Brio M., Hunter J., Webb G. The von Neumann paradox in weak shockreection // J. Fluid Mech. 2000. Vol. 442. Pp. 193205.Vasil'ev E., Kraiko A. Numerical simulation of weak shock diraction over a wedge under the von Neumann paradox conditions // Comput. Math.
Phys. 1999. Vol. 39.Pp. 13351345.120Êëàññèôèêàöèÿ ðàçíîâèäíîñòåé îòðàæåíèÿ óäàðíîé âîëíû îò êëèíà. ×àñòü 2. Ýêñïåðèìåíòàëüíîå è ÷èñëåííîå èññëåäîâàíèå ðàçíîâèäíîñòåé ìàõîâñêîãî îòðàæåíèÿ // Æóðí. Òåõí. ôèç. 2009. Ò. 79(4).91. Ñåìåíîâ À.Í., Áåðåçêèíà Ì.Ê., Êðàñîâñêàÿ È.Â.Ñ. 5258.92. Ñåìåíîâ À.Í., Áåðåçêèíà Ì.Ê., Êðàñîâñêàÿ È.Â.93.94.95.96.Êëàññèôèêàöèÿ ðàçíîâèäíîñòåé îòðàæåíèÿ óäàðíîé âîëíû îò êëèíà. ×àñòü 1. Ãðàíèöû è îáëàñòè ñóùåñòâîâàíèÿ ðàçëè÷íûõ òèïîâ îòðàæåíèÿ // Æóðí. Òåõí. ôèç. 2009. Ò. 79(4). Ñ. 4651.Tesdall A.
M., Hunter J. K. Self-similar solutions for weak shock reection // J. Appl.Maths. 2002. Vol. 63. Pp. 4261.Marchiano R., Baskar S., Coulouvrat F., Thomas J.-L. Experimental evidence of deviationfrom mirror reection for acoustical shock waves // Phys. Rev. 2007. Vol. E 76.
P. 056602.Baskar S., Coulouvrat F., Marchiano R. Nonlinear reection of grazing acoustic shockwaves: unsteady transition from von Neumann to Mach to Snell-Descartes reections //J. Fluid Mech. 2007. Vol. 575. Pp. 2755.Averkiou M., Cleveland R. Modeling of an electrohydraulic lithotripter with the KZK equation // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999. Vol.
106, no. 1. Pp. 102112.97. Kulkarny V. An experimental investigation on focussing of weak shock waves in air: Ph. D.thesis / California Institute of Technology. 1975.98. Áåññîíîâà Î.Â., Õîõëîâà Â.À., Áýéëè Ì.Ð., Êýííè Ì.Ñ., Êðàì Ë.À. Ôîêóñèðîâêà ìîùíûõ óëüòðàçâóêîâûõ ïó÷êîâ è ïðåäåëüíûå çíà÷åíèÿ ïàðàìåòðîâ ðàçðûâíûõ âîëí //Àêóñò. æóðí. 2009. Ò. 55, 4. Ñ.
445456.99. Ãàìèëüòîí Ì.Ô., Ðóäåíêî Î.Â., Õîõëîâà Â.À. Íîâûé ìåòîä ðàñ÷åòà ïàðàêñèàëüíîéîáëàñòè èíòåíñèâíûõ àêóñòè÷åñêèõ ïó÷êîâ // Àêóñò. æóðí. 1997. Ò. 43, 1.Ñ. 4853.100. Áàõâàëîâ Í.Ñ., Æèëåéêèí ß.Ì., Çàáîëîòñêàÿ Å.À. Íåëèíåéíàÿ òåîðèÿ çâóêîâûõ ïó÷êîâ. Ìîñêâà: Íàóêà, 1982.101. Ñàïîæíèêîâ Î.À. Ôîêóñèðîâêà ìîùíûõ àêóñòè÷åñêèõ èìïóëüñîâ // Àêóñò.
æóðí.1991. Ò. 37, 4. Ñ. 760769.102. Ãóñåâ Â.À. Àíàëèòè÷åñêèå ðåøåíèÿ â òåîðèè ñàìîðåôðàêöèè ñëàáûõ óäàðíûõ èìïóëüñîâ // Ñáîðíèê òðóäîâ XIX ñåññèè Ðîññèéñêîãî àêóñòè÷åñêîãî îáùåñòâà, Íèæíèé Íîâãîðîä, 24-28 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2007 ã . Ì.: Ãåîñ. 2007. Ò. 1. Ñ. 159162.103. Ìóñàòîâ À.Ã., Ñàïîæíèêîâ Î.À.
Ôîêóñèðîâêà ìîùíûõ àêóñòè÷åñêèõ èìïóëüñîâ ïðèðàçëè÷íûõ óãëàõ ðàñêðûòèÿ âîëíîâîãî ôðîíòà // Àêóñò. æóðí. 1993. Ò. 39, 2.Ñ. 315320.104. Ìóñàòîâ À.Ã., Ñàïîæíèêîâ Î.À. Íåëèíåéíûå ýôôåêòû ïðè ôîêóñèðîâêå àêóñòè÷åñêèõ èìïóëüñîâ ñ óäàðíûì ôðîíòîì // Àêóñò. æóðí. 1993. Ò. 39, 3. Ñ.
510516.105. Tabak E., Rosales R. Focusing of weak shocks waves and the von Neumann paradox ofoblique shock reection // Phys. Fluids. 1994. Vol. 6. Pp. 18741892.106. Khokhlova V., Souchon R., Tavakkoli J., Sapozhnikov O., Cathignol D. Numerical modeling of nite amplitude sound beams: Shock formation in the near eld of a cw plane pistonsource // J. Acoust. Soc.
Am. 2001. Vol. 110, no. 1. Pp. 95108.107. Áåññîíîâà Î.Â. Íåëèíåéíûå ýôôåêòû â ìîùíûõ ôîêóñèðîâàííûõ óëüòðàçâóêîâûõïó÷êàõ: ìîäåëèðîâàíèå è ïðèìåíåíèå â íåèíâàçèâíîé õèðóðãèè: Êàíäèäàòñêàÿ äèññåðòàöèÿ / Ìîñêâà. 2010.121Ýôôåêòû àêóñòè÷åñêîé íåëèíåéíîñòè ïðè òåðàïåâòè÷åñêîì âîçäåéñòâèè ìîùíîãî ôîêóñèðîâàííîãî óëüòðàçâóêà íà áèîëîãè÷åñêóþòêàíü // Àêóñò. æóðí. 2000. Ò. 46, 2. Ñ. 211219.Kurganov K., Tandmor E. New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservationlaws and convention-diusion equations // J.
Comp. Phys. 2000. Vol. 160. Pp. 241282.108. Ôèëîíåíêî Å.À., Õîõëîâà Â.À.109.110. Cleveland R., McAteer J. Physics of Shock-Wave Lithotripsy. in Smith's Textbook ofEndourology, Volume I&II, 3rd Edition (eds A. D. Smith, G. H. Badlani, G. M. Premingerand L. R. Kavoussi), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 2012.111. Steinberg J. ESWT role in Wound care // Podiatry today. July 2006. Pp. 6367.112. Ito K., Fukumoto Y., Shimokawa H. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as a New andNon-invasive Angiogenic Strategy // Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2009.
Vol. 219. Pp. 19.113. Endres S., Weiskirch M., Hinz C., H ütter F., Wilke A. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapyin the treatment of pseudoarthrosis: a case report // Cases J. 2008. Vol. 1. P. 276.114. Wang C. An overview of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders // Chang GungMed. J. 2003. Vol. 26. Pp. 220232.115. Ohtori S., Inoue G., Mannoji C., Saisu T., Takahashi K., Mitsuhashi S., Wada Y., Takahashi K., Yamagata M., Moriya H.
Shock wave application to rat skin induces degenerationand reinnervation of sensory nerve bers // Neurosci Lett. 2001. Vol. 315. P. 57 60.116. Cleveland R., Chitnis P., McClure S. Acoustic eld of a ballistic shock wave therapy device // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007. Vol. 33. Pp. 13271335.117. Brown K., Nickels F., Caron J., Mullineaux D., Clayton H. Investigation of the immediate118.119.120.121.122.123.124.125.analgesic eects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for treatment of navicular disease inhorses // Ultrasound Med.
Biol. 2005. Vol. 34. P. 554 558.Buchbinder R., Ptasznik R., Gordon J., Buchanan J., Prabaharan V., Forbes A. Ultrasoundguided extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis // JAMA. 2002. Vol. 288.P. 1364 1372.Haake M., König I., Decker T., Riedel C., Buch M., M üller H., Vogel M., Auersperg V.,Maier-Boerries O.
et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateralepicondylitis: A randomized multicenter trial. // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2002. Vol. 84.P. 19821991.Osman M., Alfano Y., Kamp S. et al, 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy // Eur Urol. 2005.Vol. 57, no. 6. Pp. 860864.Äçåðàíîâ Í.Ê., Áåøëèåâ Ä.À., Ãîëîâàíîâ Ñ.À., Ìîñêàëåíêî Ñ.À., Ñèíþõèí Â.Í.
Ðåçèäóàëüíûå êàìíè ïî÷åê è èõ ëå÷åíèå // Óðîëîãèÿ. 2003. Ò. 1. Ñ. 2126.Shah A., Harper B., J. Cunitz, Wang Y.-N., Paun M., Simon J., Lu W., Kaczkowski P.,Bailey M. Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney // The Journal of Urology .2012. Vol. 187. Pp. 739743.Hickey H. Trial to test using ultrasound to move kidney stones // News and Informationabout University of Washington . January 10, 2014.Perez C.
Characterizing ultrasound pressure elds, microbubbles and their interaction:Ph. D. thesis / Center for Industrial and Medical Ultrasound (CIMU), Applied PhysicsLab, University of Washington. 2015.Hamilton M., Blackstock D. Nonlinear Acoustics. Academic, San Diego, 1998.122Âëèÿíèå óãëîâîé àïåðòóðû ìåäèöèíñêèõ óëüòðàçâóêîâûõ èçëó÷àòåëåé íà ïàðàìåòðû íåëèíåéíîãî óäàðíî-âîëíîâîãî ïîëÿâ ôîêóñå // Àêóñò. æóðí. 2015. Ò. 61, 3. Ñ. 325332.126.
Ðîñíèöêèé Ï.Á., Þëäàøåâ Ï.Â., Õîõëîâà Â.À.127. Þëäàøåâ Ï.Â. Íåëèíåéíûå âçàèìîäåéñòâèÿ ðàçðûâíûõ àêóñòè÷åñêèõ âîëí â ñðåäàõñ ðàñïðåäåëåííûìè â îáúåìå è íà ãðàíèöàõ ñëó÷àéíûìè íåîäíîðîäíîñòÿìè: Êàíäèäàòñêàÿ äèññåðòàöèÿ / Ìîñêâà. 2011.128. Westervelt P. Parametric Acoustic Array // J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 1963. Vol. 35, no. 4.Pp. 535537.123.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
