Диссертация (1101287), страница 35
Текст из файла (страница 35)
A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2002.156. McDonald S.A., Shillcock R.C. Rethinking the word frequency effect: Theneglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language andSpeech, 44 (3), 2001, pp.
295–323.157. McEnery T., Wilson A. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press, 1996.158. McGee I. Adjective-noun collocations in elicited and corpus data: Similarities,differences, and the whys and wherefores, Corpus Linguistics and LinguisticTheory 5 (1), 2009, pp. 79–103159. McKoon G., MacFarland T.
Externally and internally caused change of stateverbs. Language 76 (4), 2000, pp. 833–858.160. Miller P. Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar. New York:Garland Publications, 1992.161. Miller P., Sag I.A. French clitic movement without clitics or movement. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 15 (3), 1997, pp. 573–639.213162. Monachesi P. A Lexical Approach to Italian Cliticization. Stanford, CA: CSLIPublications, 1999.163. Monachesi P. Clitic placement in the Romanian verbal complex. In Gerlach B.,Grijzenhout J.
(eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 2000, pp. 255-293.164. Monachesi P. The Verbal Complex in Romance. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2005.165. Monaghan P., Chater N., Christiansen M.H. The differential role of phonologicaland distributional cues in grammatical categorization. Cognition 96 (2), 2005, pp.143–182.166. Murfitt T., McAllister J. The effect of production variables in monolog and dialogon comprehension by novel listeners. Language and Speech, 44 (3), 2001, pp.325–350.167. Nespor M., Vogel I. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1986.168.
Nordquist D. Investigating elicited data from a usage-based perspective. CorpusLinguistics and Linguistic Theory 5 (1), 2009, pp. 105–130.169. Noyer R.R. Clitic sequences in Nunggubuyu and PF convergence. NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory, 19, 2001, pp. 751–826.170. Paducheva E.V. La particule ŽE: semantique, syntaxe et prosodie. Les particulesénonciatives en Russe contemporain, Vol. 3, 1987, pp.
11–44.171. Paillard D., Markovicz D. Le partage du savoir ou l'ignorance n'est pas unargument. A propos de la particule VED'. // Le particules les énonciatives en russecontemporain. Vol. 1. Paris, 1986.172. Paillard D. Že ou la sortie impossible. // Les particules énonciatives en russecontemporain. Vol. 2. Paris, 1987.173. Pander Maat H., Sanders T. Subjectivity in causal connectives: An empiricalstudy of language in use. Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. 12, No.
3, 2001, pp. 247–273.214174. Perlmutter D. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt,Reinhart, and Winston, 1971.175. Poesio M., Sturt P., Artstein R., Filik R. Under specification and anaphora:Theoretical issues and preliminary evidence. Discourse Processes 42 (2), 2006,pp. 157–175.176. Prince A., Smolensky P. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in GenerativeGrammar, 1993.177. Progovać L. Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position.
In HalpernA., Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and RelatedPhenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 411–428.178. Quirk R. Towards a description of English Usage. Transactions of the PhilologicalSociety, 1960, pp. 40–61.179. Radanović-Kocić V. The placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: a prosodicapproach. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.), Approaching Second: Second PositionClitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1996, pp. 429–445.180. Reali F., Christiansen M.H.
Processing of relative clauses is made easier byfrequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57 (1), 2007, pp. 1–23.181. Rizzi L. A restructuring rule. In Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: ForisPublications, 1982, pp. 1–48.182. Sadler L. Clitics and the structure-function mapping. In Butt M., King T.H. (eds.),Proceedings of LFG97. Stanford, CA, 1997.183. Sadock J.M.
Autolexical Syntax: A Theory of Parallel GrammaticalRepresentations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.184. Sag I., Wasow Th., Bender E. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford,CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2003.185.
Samvelian P. A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal ofLinguistics, 43 (3), 2007, pp. 605–645.215186. Sandra D., Frisson S., Daems F. Why simple verb forms can be so difficult tospell: The influence of homophone frequency and distance in Dutch. Brain andLanguage, 68 (1), 1999, pp. 277–283.187. Schauer G.A., Adolphs S. Expressions of gratitude in corpus and DCT data:Vocabulary, formulaic sequences, and pedagogy. System, Vol. 34, 2006, pp.
119–134.188. Schäufele S. Now that we’re all here where do we sit? Phonological ordering inthe Vedic clause-initial string. In Halpern A., Zwicky A. (eds.), ApproachingSecond: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLIPublications, 1996, pp. 447–475.189. Schmitt N., Grandage S., Adolphs S. Are corpus-derived recurrent clusterspsycholinguistically valid? In Schmitt N. (ed.), Formulaic Sequences.Acquisition, Processing and Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004, pp. 127–151.190. Serkhane J.E., Schwartz J.-L., Boë L.-J., Davis B.L., Matyear C.L.
Infants’vocalizations analyzed with an articulatory model: A preliminary report. Journalof Phonetics, 35 (3), 2007, pp. 321–340.191. Simpson J., Withgott M. Pronominal clitic clusters and templates. In Borer H.(ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19. Orlando:Academic Press, 1986, pp. 149–174.192. Siyanova A., Schmitt N. L2 learner production and processing of collocation: Amulti-study perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revuecanadienne des langues vivantes, Vol 64, No. 3, 2008, pp. 429–458.193. Spencer A.
Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure inGenerative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991.194. Spencer A. Review of Sadock 1991. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 1993, pp. 143–155.216195. Spencer A. Verbal clitics in Bulgarian. A Paradigm Function Morphologyapproach. In Gerlach B., Grijzenhout J. (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology,and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2001, pp. 355–386.196. Spencer A., Luís A.R. Clitics: an introduction. Cambridge Textbooks inLinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.197.
Spivey-Knowlton M., Sedivy J. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multipleconstraints. Cognition, 55 (3), 1995, pp. 227–267.198. Sportiche D. Clitic constructions. In Zaring L.A., Rooryck J. (eds.), PhraseStructure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996, pp.213–276.199. Sproat R. Morphology as component or module: mapping principle approaches.In Spencer A., Zwicky A. (ed.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 1998, pp. 335–348.200.
Stump G.T. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.201. Szczegielniak A. Clitic positions within the left periphery: evidence for aphonological buffer. In Heggie L., Ordóñez F. (eds.), Clitic and AffixCombinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2005, pp.
283–299.202. Testelets Y.G. Are there strong and weak pronouns in Russian? In Browne W.,Kim J.-Y., Partee B.H., Rothstein R.A. (eds.), Formal Approaches to SlavicLinguistics: The Amherst Meeting 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan SlavicPublications, 2003, pp. 515–538.203. Thráinsson H., Angantýsson A., Svavarsdóttir A., Eythórsson Th., Jónsson J.G.The Icelandic (pilot) project in ScanDiaSyn.
Nordlyd, 34 (1), 2007, pp. 87–124.204. Toivonen I. Non-Projecting Words: A Case Study of Swedish Particles.Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003.205. Tremblay A. Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the use ofgrammaticality judgment tasks in linguistic theory. Second Language Studies, 24(1), 2005, 129–167.217206. Uriagereka J. Doubling and possession. In Gerlach B., Grijzenhout J.
(eds.),Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,2000, pp. 405–431.207. Wackernagel J. Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. //Indogermanische Forschungen, 1, 1892, s. 333–436.208. Wescoat M.T. On Lexical Sharing. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 2002.209. Wierzbicka A. Particles and linguistic relativity. // International Revue of SlavicLinguistics.
Vol. 1, No. 2/3, 1976, рр. 327-367.210. Wulff S. Converging evidence from corpus and experimental data to captureidiomaticity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 5 (1), 2009, pp. 131–159.211. Zwicky A.M. On Clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club,1977.212.
Zwicky A.M. Clitics and particles. Language, 61 (2), 1985a, pp. 283–305.213. Zwicky A.M. How to describe inflection. In Niepokuj M., Van Clay M.,Nikiforidou V., Feder D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley,1985b.214. Zwicky A.M., Pullum G.K. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language, 59,1983, pp. 502–513.218.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
