Диссертация (1100915), страница 48
Текст из файла (страница 48)
39—90. — (Language, Speech, and Communication).Dalrymple M., Lamping J. [и др.] antifiers, anaphora and intensionality //Journal of Logic, Language and Information. — 1997. — Т. 6, № 3. — С. 219—273.Dalrymple M., Nikolaeva I. Objects and information structure. — Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2011. — (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics ; 131).Daniel M., Lander Y. e girl that is said, the meat that has been slaughtered, andthe life that will be longed: on peculiar cases of relativization in East Caucasian //Syntax of the World’s Languages IV: book of abstracts (23—26 сент. 2010). —Lyon, 2010. — С. 22—23.Davidson D. On the Logical Form of Action Sentences // e Logic of Decision andAction / ред. N.
Rescher. — Pisburgh : University of Pisburgh Press, 1967. —С. 81—120.Davison A. Adjunction, features and locality in Sanskrit and Hindi/Urducorrelatives // Correlatives cross-linguistically / ред. A. Lipták. — Amsterdam,Philadelphia : John Benjamins, 2009. — С. 223—262. — (Language Faculty andBeyond ; 1).Dayal V. antification in correlatives // antification in Natural Languages. Т. 2 /ред. E.
W. Bach [и др.]. — Dordrecht, Boston, London : Kluwer, 1995. — С. 179—205.DeLancey S. Relativization and Nominalization in Bodic // Proceedings of theTwenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: SpecialSession on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian Linguistics. — 2002. — С. 55—72.Литература269Dixon R. M. W.
Basic linguistic theory. Т. 1. Methodology. — Oxford : OxfordUniversity Press, 2010a.Dixon R. M. W. Basic linguistic theory. Т. 2. Grammatical topics. — Oxford : OxfordUniversity Press, 2010b.Dixon R. M. W. Basic linguistic theory. Т. 3. Further grammatical topics. — Oxford :Oxford University Press, 2012.Doron E.
On the syntax and semantics of resumptive pronouns // ResumptivePronouns at the Interfaces / ред. A. Rouveret. — Amsterdam, Philadelphia : JohnBenjamins, 2011. — С. 287—318. — (Language Faculty and Beyond ; 5).Dryer M. S. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory:e standing challenge of grammar writing // Catching language / ред. F. Ameka,A. Dench, N. Evans. — Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. — С. 207—234. — (Trendsin Linguistics.
Studies and Monographs ; 167).Durkin-Meisterernst D. Khwarezmian // e Iranian languages / ред. G. Windfuhr. —London : Routledge, 2009a. — С. 336—376. — (Routledge Language Family Series).Durkin-Meisterernst D. Shughni // e Iranian languages / ред. D. I. Edelman,L. R. Dodykhudoeva. — London : Routledge, 2009b. — С. 787—824. — (RoutledgeLanguage Family Series).É. Kiss K., ред.
Discourse Configurational Languages. — Oxford : Oxford UniversityPress, 1995.Emmerick R. E. Khotanese and Tumshuqese // e Iranian languages / ред. G.Windfuhr. — London : Routledge, 2009. — С. 377—415. — (Routledge LanguageFamily Series).Erdal M. A Grammar of Old Turkic.
— Leiden, Boston : Brill, 2004. — (Handbook ofOriental studies. Central Asia).Erschler D. Sluicing-like Phenomena and the Location of CP in Ossetic //Proceedings of IATL28 (Tel Aviv University, 16—17 окт. 2012). — URL:https://www.academia.edu/2494508/Sluicing-like_Phenomena_and_the_Location_of_CP_in_Ossetic (дата обр. 03.01.2014). — Предст.Erschler D. Possession marking in Ossetic: arguing for Caucasian influence //Linguistic Typology.
— 2009. — № 13. — С. 417—450.Erschler D. From preverbal focus to preverbal “le periphery”: e Ossetic clausearchitecture in areal and diachronic perspective // Lingua. — 2012. — Т. 122, №6. — С. 673—699.Литература270Falk Y. N. Superiority Effects. — e Hebrew University of Jerusalem, февр. 2012. —URL: http : / / pluto . huji . ac .
il / ~msyfalk / Superiority . pdf (дата обр.04.01.2014).Forker D. A Grammar of Hinuq. — Berlin : De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. — (MoutonGrammar Library ; 63).Frajzyngier Z. A Grammar of Lele. — Stanford : CSLI Publications, 2001. — (StanfordMonographs in African Languages).Gareyshina A. [и др.] Sentential proforms and complementation in Ossetian //33.
Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellscha ür Sprachwissenscha. Text:Strukturen und Verarbeitung (Georg-August-Universität Göingen, 23—25 февр.2011). — 2011. — URL: http : / / www . zas . gwz - berlin . de / fileadmin /veranstaltung_zas/workshops/archiv/proforms/gareyshina_ossetian.pdf (дата обр. 03.01.2014).Garre A. Relative clause syntax in Lycian and Hiite // Die Sprache.
— 1994. —Т. 36. — С. 29—69.Geach P. Reference and Generality. — Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, 1962.Gibson J., Raposo E. Clause union, the stratal uniqueness law and the chômeurrelation // Natural Language and Linguistic eory. — 1986. — № 4.Ginzburg J., Sag I. A. Interrogative Investigations. — Stanford, CA : CSLIPublications, 2000. — (CSLI Lecture Notes ; 123).Giorgi A. Toward a theory of long distance anaphors: a GB approach // eLinguistic Review.
— 1984. — Т. 3. — С. 307—361.Girard J.-Y. Linear logic // eoretical Computer Science. — 1987. — № 50. — С. 1—102.Green G. M. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses // Language. — 1976. —№ 52. — С. 382—397.Grosu A. Strange relatives at the interface of two millenia // Glot International. —2002. — Т. 6, № 6. — С. 145—167.Grosu A., Landman F. Strange Relatives of the ird Kind // Natural LanguageSemantics.
— 1998. — Т. 6, вып. 2, № 2. — С. 125—170.Haddad Y. A. Copy Control in Telugu // Journal of Linguistics. — 2009. — Т. 45, №1. — С. 69—109.Haegeman L., Ürögdi B. Referential CPs and DPs: An operator movement account //eoretical Linguistics. — 2010. — Т. 36, № 2. — С. 111—152.Литература271Harris A. C. On the history of relative clauses in Georgian // Non-slavic languages ofthe USSR: papers from the Fourth Conference / ред. H. I. Aronson. — Columbus,OH : Slavica, 1994.
— С. 130—142.Haspelmath M. e converb as a cross-linguistically valid category // Converbsin cross-linguistic perspective: Structure and meaning of adverbial verb forms adverbial participles, gerunds / ред. M. Haspelmath, E. König. — Berlin : Moutonde Gruyter, 1995. — С. 1—55. — (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology ;13).Haug D. T. T. Partial dynamic semantics for anaphora: compositionality withoutsyntactic coindexation // Journal of Semantics. — URL: http://jos.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/08/19/jos.fft008.abstract (дата обр.25.01.2014).
— Пред. пуб.Hawkins J. A. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. — Oxford, New York : OxfordUniversity Press, 2004.Heim I. R. e semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases: диссертация PhD /Heim Irene Roswitha. — University of Massachuses — Amherst, 1982. — URL:http:/ /scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI8229562 (дата обр.16.01.2014).Heine B., Kuteva T.
World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. — Cambridge : CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004.Heine B., Kuteva T. Language contact and grammatical change. — Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2005. — (Cambridge Approaches to LanguageContact).Hendery R. Relative clauses in time and space.
— Amsterdam, Philadelphia : JohnBenjamins, 2012. — (Typological Studies in Language ; 101).Henning W. B. A fragment of a Khwarezmian dictionary / ред. D. N. MacKenzie. —London : Lund Humphries, 1971.Hewi B. G. e Typology of Subordination in Georgian and Abkhaz. — Berlin :Mouton de Gruyter, 1987. — (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology ; 5).Hock H. H. Conjoined we stand: theoretical implications of Sanskrit relativestructures // Studies in the Linguistic Sciences. — 1989. — Т. 19, № 1.
—С. 93—126.Hoffner H. A. J., Melchert H. C. A Grammar of the Hiite Language. Ч. 1. ReferenceGrammar. — Winona Lake, IN : Eisenbraus, 2008.Литература272Howard W. A. e formulae-as-types notion of construction // To H.B. Curry: essayson combinatory logic, lambda calculus, and formalism / ред. J. P. Seldin, J.
R.Hindley. — London : Academic Press, 1980. — С. 479—490.Huggard M. On wh-(non)-movement and internal structures of the Hiite preposedrelative clause // Proceedings of the 22nd Annual UCLA Indo-EuropeanConference / ред. S. W. Jamison, H. C. Melchert, B. Vine. — Bremen : Hempen,2011. — С. 83—104.Inada S. On the “AMOUNT” relativization and its relatives // Linguistic Research.
—2009. — Т. 25. — С. 85—102.Izvorski R. e syntax and semantics of correlative proforms // Proceedings of NELS26 / ред. K. Kusumoto. — Amherst, MA : GLSA, 1996. — С. 133—147.Jackendoff R. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. — Cambridge, MA :MIT Press, 1972.Jackendoff R. X-bar syntax: a study of phrase structure. — Cambridge, MA : MITPress, 1977. — (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs ; 2).Jackendoff R., Culicover P. W. e semantic basis of control in English // Language. —2003. — Т.
79. — С. 517—556.Jäger G. Anaphora and type logical grammar. — Dordrecht : Springer, 2005. —(Trends in Logic ; 24).Janke V. Control without a subject // Lingua. — 2008. — Т. 118, № 1. — С. 82—118.Johannessen J. B. Coordination.
— New York, Oxford : Oxford University Press,1998. — (Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax).Johanson L. e structure of Turkic // e Turkic languages / ред. L. Johanson,É. Á. Csató. — London, New York : Routledge, 1998. — С. 30—66. — (RoutledgeLanguage Family Descriptions).Kachru Y. Some Aspects of Pronominalization and Relative Clause Construction inHindi-Urdu // Studies in the Linguistic Sciences. — 1973. — № 3. — С. 87—103.Kachru Y. On Relative Clause Formation in Hindi-Urdu // Linguistics.
— 1978. — №207. — С. 5—26.Kamp H. A theory of truth and semantic representation // Formal Methods in theStudy of Language / ред. J. A. Groenendijk, T. M. Janssen, M. B. Stokhof. —Amsterdam : Mathematical Centre, 1981. — С. 277—322. — (Mathematical CentreTracts ; 135).Kamp H., Reyle U. From Discourse to Logic. — Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1993.Литература273Kaplan R. M., Bresnan J.
Lexical-Functional Grammar: a formal system forgrammatical representations // e mental representation of grammaticalrelations / ред. J. Bresnan. — Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1982. — С. 173—281.Kaplan R. M., Maxwell III J. T. Constituent coordination in Lexical-FunctionalGrammar // Formal issues in Lexical-Functional Grammar / ред. M. Dalrymple[и др.]. — Stanford : CSLI Publications, 1995. — С. 199—210. — (CSLI LectureNotes).Kaplan R. M., Zaenen A. Long-distance dependencies, constituent structure, andfunctional uncertainty // Alternative conceptions of phrase structure / ред.
M. R.Baltin, A. S. Kroch. — Chicago : Chicago University Press, 1989. — С. 17—42.Karunen L. Discourse referents // Notes from the Linguistic Underground / ред.J. McCawley. — New York : Academic Press, 1976. — С. 363—385. — (Syntax andSemantics ; 7).Kayne R. Why Isn’t is a Complementizer? // Comparisons and Contrasts. —Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2010. — С. 190—227.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
