Диссертация (Трансформация древнеримского концепта «верность» (fides) в культуре поздней античности), страница 38

Barton C. A. Roman Honor. The fire in the Bones. London: University ofCalifornia Press, 2001. – 342 p.81. Barton C. The Price of Peace at Rome // War and Peace in the Ancient World. ed.Raaflaub K.A. MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. P. 245-255.82. Bauer W.

A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other EarlyChristian Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957. – 1188 p.83. Becker C. Fides // Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum. 1968. VII. S. 801-839.84. Bloch H. A. The concept of our changing loyalties: an introductory study into thenature of the social individual. New York: Columbia University Press, 1934. – 319p.85.

Böhme H. Transformation . Einladung zur Transformation // Transformation - EinKonzept zur Erforschung kulturellenünchen:andels. Ed.hme, H.,ergemann L.ilhelm Fink, 2011. S. 7-39.86. Botte D. B. Des Sacrements, Des Mysteres. Paris: Sources Chretiennes. 1950. – 54p.87. Bovini G. La scene della 'dextrarum iunctio' nell'arte Cristiana // Bullettino dellacommissione archeologica communale di Roma.

1946. № 72. P. 113-114.88. Boyance P. Les Romains, peuple de la fides // ulletin de l’Association uillaumeBude. Suppl. Lettres d’humanite. Paris. 1964. № XXIII. P. 419-435.89. Brent A. A Political History of Early Christianity. A&C Black, 2009. – 344 p.90. Brown P. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire.Medison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1992. – 192 p.17791. Brunt P. A.

Studies in Stoicism // ed. Crawford M, Griffin M., Samuels A. Oxford:OUP, 2013. – 521 p.92. Brunt P. A. Amicitia in the Late Roman Republic // Proceedings of the CambridgePhilological Society. 1965. Vol. 191. P. 1-20.93. Bryant S. Loyalty // James Hasting’s Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics (in 13Vols), Vol. VIII. New York: Scribners, 1915. P.183-188.94. Bunnin N., Yu Ji. Loyalty // The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy.Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. – 776 p.95.

Burns C., Mearns K., Peter M.G. Explicit and Implicit Trust Within Safety Culture// Risk Analysis 26 (5), 2006. P. 1139-1150.96. Burton P. J. Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in theMiddle Republic (353–146 BC). N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2011. – 408p.97. Buschmann N., Borromäus K. M.

Treue: politische Loyalität und militärischeefolgschaft in deroderne.ttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008. – 455 S.98. Calderone S. ΠΙΣΤΙΣ—FIDES: Ricerche di storia e diritto internazionale nell'antichità. Rome: Tipografia S. Pio X, 1964. S. 45–52.99. Cameron A. The Mediterranean World in Late Antiquity: AD 395-700. LondonN.Y.: Routledge, 2015. – 320 p.100. Campbell D.A. The Quest for Paul’s ospel: A Suggested Strategy. London, N.Y.:T & T Clark International, 2005. – 290 p.101.Carneiro R. The Cultural Process // Essays in the Science of Culture. N.Y.: 1960.P. 145-161.102.

Clancy J.J. The Old Dispensation: Loyalty in Business. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ.Press, 1998. – 339 p.103. Clark A. J. Nasica and Fides // Classical Quarterly 57 (1), 2007. P. 125-131.104. Connor J. The Sociology of Loyalty. US: Springer Science & Business Media,2007. – 162 p.178105. Crook Z. A. Reconceptualising Conversion: Patronage, Loyalty, and Conversion inthe Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004. – 310p.106. Dahlheim W. Struktur und Entwicklung des r mischen V lkerrechts im im drittenund zweiten Jahrhundert v.

Chr. //ünchen: C.H. Beck, 1968. – 293 p.107. Danker F. W. Benefactor // Epigrphic Study of a Greco-Roman and NewTestament Semantic Field. St. Louis: Clayton Publishing House, 1982. – 509 p.108. Deissmann A. Light from the Ancient East: The New Testament Illustrated byRecently Discovered Texts of the Graeco-Roman World. London: Hodder &Stoughton, 1910. – 514 p.109. Demougeot E. “Paganus”,ithra et Tertullien // Studia patristica. Papers presentedto the Third International Conferens on Patristic, erlin, №III, 1961. P.

354-365.110. Dmitriev S. The Greek Slogan of Freedom and Early Roman Politics in Greece.USA: OUP, 2011. – 524 p.111. Dorschel A. Ideengeschichte.112. Duden.Diedeutschettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2010. – 216 S.Rechtschreibung.[Electronicresource]//URL:https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/Treue (accessed: 29.08.13).113. Eisenstadt S.

N., Roniger L. Patrons, Clients and Friends: Interpersonal Relationsand the Structure of Trust in Society. Cambridge University Press, 1984. – 343 p.114. Elvers K.L.ilitary clientele. [Electronic resource] // rill’s New Pauly, Antiquityvolumes. ed. Cancik H., Schneider H. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15749347_bnp_e12222430 (accessed: 29.08.16).115. Elyot T. The Book Named the Governor. London: Dent, 1962.

– 241 p.116. Engels L. J. Fiducia // Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, V. 7. Stuttgart:Hiersemann, 1968. S. 839-877.117. Ewin R.E. Loyalty: The Police // Criminal Justice Ethics. 1990. 9 (2). P. 3-15.118. Faces of Communities: Social Ties between Trust, Loyalty and Conflict / eds.Feickert S., Haut A., Sharaf K.ttingen: V&R unipress m H, 2014. – 276 p.119.

Felten E. Loyalty. The vexing virtue. N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 2011. – 320 p.179120. Fichte J. G. Grundlage des naturrechts nach principien der wissenschaftslehre. Ienaund Leipzig: C.E. Gabler, 1796. – 250 s.121. Fletcher G. P. Loyalty: An Essay on the Morality of Relationships. OxfordUniversity Press: 1995.

– 224 p.122. Fraenkel E. Fides / Thesaurus Linguae Latinae, Bd. VI, 1927. – S. 66l-691.123. Fraenkel E. Zureschichte desortes „fides“ // Rheinischesuseum, LXXI.1916. P. 187-199.124. Freyburger G. Fides: étude sémantique et réligieuse depuis les origines jusqu’ŕl’époque augustéenne. Paris, Les elles Lettres, 1986. – 361 p.125. Gabriel R.

A. Great Captains of Antiquity. Westport, Connecticut-London:Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001. – 242 p.126. Garnsey P., Humfress C. The Evolution of the Late Antique World. Cambridge:Orchard Academic, 2001. – 252 p.127. Georgi D. God Turned Upside Down // Paul and Empire: Religion and Power inRoman Imperial Society. ed. A.

R. Horsley. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1997.– 257 p.128. Georgi D. The City in the Valley: Biblical Interpretation and Urban Theology.Atlanta: Society of Biblical Lit, 2005. – 370 p.129. Gillespie T.W. Welker M. The First Theologians: A Study in Early ChristianProphecy. Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1994 – 304 p.130.Gladhill B.

Rethinking Roman Alliance: A Study in Poetics and Society.Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016. – 216 p.131. Graus F. Ü er die sogenannte germanische Treue // Historica I. Praha:Nakladatelství Ceskoslovenské Akademie Vĕd. 1959. d. 1. S. 71-121.132. Greek English Lexicon of the. New Testament, Based on Semantic Domains ( in 2vols).Vol.2. / ed. Louw J. P., Nida E. A. Vol. 2.

New York: UBS, 1988. – 375 p.133. Greenidge A. H. J. Infamia: Its place in Roman public and private law. Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1894. – 72 p.134. Grodzin D. The Loyal and the Disloyal: Social Boundaries of Patriotism andTreason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956. – 329 p.180135. Hampl F. Stoische Staatsethik und frühes Rom. / Klein R. Das Staatdenken derR mer. Damstadt:issenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1973. S. 116-142.136.

Hampsher-Monk I., Tilmans K., Vree F. P. I. M. History of Concepts: ComparativePerspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1998. – 336 p.137. Harfensteller J. C. Koselleck applied: contributions of the distinction betweenlanguage and action to the study of social concepts. [Electronic resource] // PanelPresentation for the workshop panel «The Sediments of History: Language andTime in the International Perception of Reinhart Koselleck» at the The 10thAnnual International Conference on Conceptual History Istanbul, Turkey, August30–September2,2007URL:https://www.academia.edu/865457/Koselleck_applied_contributions_of_the_distinction_between_language_and_action_to_the_study_of_social_concepts (accessed:12.01.17).138.

Healy M. School choice, brand loyalty and civic loyalty // Journal of Philosophy ofEducation. 2007. № 41(4). P. 743–756.139. Heinze R. Fides // Hermes. 1929. № 64 (1). 1929. S. 140-166.140. Higgins K.M. Loyalty from a confucian perspective // Loyalty: NOMOS LIV /Levinson S., Parker J., Woodruff P. N.

Y.: New York University Press, 2013. P.22-38.141. Hildreth, J. A. D., Gino F., Bazerman M. Blind loyalty? When group loyaltymakes us see evil or engage in it // Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses. 2016. № 132. P. 16-36.142. Hirzel R. Der Eid: ein beitrag zu seiner geschichte. Leipzig: Verlag von S. Hirzel,1902. – 225 S.143. Hume D. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Publisher Clarendon Press, 1888.– 709 p.144. Jubert S. Paul as Benefactor: Reciprocity, Strategy and Theological Reflection inPaul's Collection.

Germany: Mohr Siebeck, 2000. – 219 p.181145. Junge K., Postoutenko K. Asymmetrical Concepts after Reinhart Koselleck:Historical Semantics andeyond. Newrunswiсk-London:Transcript, 2014. –256 p.146. Kaag J. American Interpretations of Hegel: Josiah Royce's Philosophy of LoyaltyHistory of Philosophy Quarterly. 2009. Vol. 26. No. 1. P. 83-101.147.

Keller S. The Limits of Loyalty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. –232 p.148. Kleinig J. Loyalty. [Electronic resource] // The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy(2013Edition).URL:http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/loyalty/ (accessed: 2.01.2014)149. Kleinig J. On Loyalty and Loyalties: The Contours of a Problematic Virtue.Oxford University Press, 2014. – 315 p.150. Konvitz M. R.

Loyalty // Wiener P.P. Encyclopedia of the History of Ideas (in VIVols). Vol. 3, N.Y.: Scribner's, 1973. – 108 p.151. Koselleck R. A response to comments on the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. / Themeaning of historical terms and concepts. Ed. Lehmann H., Richter M. // NewStudies on Begriffsgeschishte. 1996. №15.