Диссертация (Концептуализация понятия женской красоты в культурологическом дискурсе), страница 28
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Концептуализация понятия женской красоты в культурологическом дискурсе". PDF-файл из архива "Концептуализация понятия женской красоты в культурологическом дискурсе", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "культурология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата культурологии.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 28 страницы из PDF
P. 163–186.155. Chambers, S. A. «Sex» and the Problem of the Body: Reconstructing JudithButler’s Theory of Sex/Gender // Body & Society. – 2007. – N 13. – P. 47–75.156. Connell, R. Gender and Power. Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. –Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. – P. 134–198.157. Connell, R. W. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept / R.
W.Connell, J. W. Messerschmidt //Gender & Society. – December 2005. – Vol. 19, N 6. –P. 829−859.158. Connell, R. Masculinity and Globalization// Introduction to Gender Studies.Part 2. A Reader. – St. Petersburg: Aletheia. – 430 р.159. Critical Realism: Essential Readings / ed. M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A.
Colleir,T. Lawson and A. Norrie. – London: Routledge, 1998. – 784 p.152160. Crossley, N. The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire. – London: SagePublications Ltd., 2001. – 176 p.161. Cucchiari, S. The Gender Revolution and the Transition from BisexualHorde to Patrilocal Band: The Origin of Gender Hierarchy // Sexual Meanings: theCultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality / Ed.
by S. Ortner and H. Whitehead. –New York: Cambridge, 1981. – P. 31–79.162. Davis, K. ‘My Body is My Art’: Cosmetic Surgery as Feminist Utopia? //Davis K. (ed.) Embodied Practices: Feminist Perspectives on the Body. – London: SagePublications Ltd., 1997. – P. 168–181.163. Davis, K. Reshaping the Female body.
– London: Routledge, 1995. – 224 p.164. Dawn, H. Currie Decoding Femininity: Advertisements and Their TeenageReaders // Gender and Society, 1997. – Vol. 11, N 4. – P. 453–477.165. Definition of «selfie» in English // Oxford Dictionaries [Электронныйресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/selfie (датаобращения 04.02.2017)166. Delphy, C. Rethinking Sex and Gender // Sex in Question: Frenchmaterialist feminism / Ed. by Diana Leonard and Liza Adkins. – London, Bristol:Taylor & Francis, 1996. – P. 31–42.167. Dove – «За Истинную Красоту» [Электронный ресурс].
– Режимдоступа: http://www.mediarevolution.ru/advertiser/brands/121.html (дата обращения03.12.2016)168. Dove’s «Real Beauty Sketches» Ad Campaign Tells Women «You’re MoreBeautifulThanYouThink»[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/15/doves-real-beauty-sketches-ad-campaignvideo_n_3088071.html (дата обращения 04.12.2016)169. Dozier, R. Beards, breasts, and bodies: Doing sex in a gendered world //Gender & Society. – 2005. – Vol.
19, N 3. – P. 297–316.170. Evans, J. Book Review: The Body in Culture, Technology and Society //Acta Sociologica. – 2005. – N 48. – P. 93–95.153171. Evans, M. Real Bodies: A Sociological Introduction / M. Evans, E. Lee. –Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. – 240 p.172. Fausto-Sterling, A. Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction ofsexuality. – New York: Basic Books, 2000. – 496 p.173. Fausto-Sterling, A. The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough// The Sciences. – 1993. March/April. – P. 20–24.174. Featherstone, М. The Body in Consumer Culture // Theory, Culture &Society. – 1982.
1 (2). – P. 18–33.175. Friedman, A. Toward a Sociology of Perception: Sight, Sex, and Gender //Cultural Sociology. – 2011. 5 (2). – P. 187–206176. Frost, L. Young Women and the Body. A Feminist Sociology. – Basingstokeand New York: Palgrave, 2001. – 224 p.177. Gatens, M. A critique of the sex/gender distinction. // A Reader in FeministKnowledge. – London: Routledge. 1991. – P.
139–157.178. Garfinkel, H. Studies in ethnomethodology. – Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall, 1967. – P. 34–108.179. Giddens, A. Modernity and Self-Identity. – Cambridge: Polity Press 1991. –264 p.180. Goffman, E. Gender advertisement. – London: MacMillian, 1979. – P. 11.181. Goffman, E. Gender Display. From «Gender Advertisements: Studies in theAnthropology of Visual Communication». // Goffman Reader.
Lemert C. and BranamanA. – Oxford: Blackwell Publ., 1997. – P. 208– 227.182. Goffman, E. The Arrangement between the Sexes // Theory and Society. –1977. – Vol. 4 (3). – P. 301–331.183. Grosz, E. Notes Towards a Corporeal Feminism // Australian FeministStudies. – 1987. – Vol. 2, N 5. – P. 1–16.184. Harris, J. Femininity, Masculinity, Physicality and the English TabloidPress: The Case of Anna Kournikova / J. Harris, B. Clayton // International Review forthe Sociology of Sport. – 2002. – Vol. 37, N 3-4. – P. 397-413.154185.
Howie, G. Between Feminism and Materialism: A Question of Method. –New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. – P. 200.186. Howson, A. Embodying Gender. – London: Routledge, 2005. – 177 p.187. Instagram.com[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:https://www.instagram.com/about/us/ (дата обращения 12.12.2016)188. ISAPS Global Statistics. Highlights of the ISAPS 2015 Statistics onCosmeticSurgery[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://www.isaps.org/news/isaps-global-statistics (дата обращения 10.02.2017)189.
Janey, B. A. Masculinity Ideology in Russian Society: Factor Structure andValidity of the Multicultural Masculinity Ideology Scale / B. A. Janey, N. V. Janey, N.Goncherova, and V. Savchenko // The Journal of Men's Studies. – 2006. Vol. 14, N 1.
–P. 93– 108.190. Leder, D. The Absent Body. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.– 229 p.191. Levant, R.F. Masculinity Ideology among Russian and U.S. Young Men andWomen and its Relationship to Unhealthy Life Style Habits among Young Russian Men/ R.F Levant, A.
Cuthbert, K. Richmond, A. Sellers, A. Matveev, O. Mitina, M.Sokolovsky, M. Heesacker // Psychology of Men & Masculinity. – 2003. Vol. 4, N 1. –P. 26–36.192. Lindsey, L. Gender Roles. A Sociological Perspective. – 3 ed. – UpperSaddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1997. – 452 p.193. Lirola, M. M. The dream of a perfect body come true: Multimodality incosmetic surgery advertising / M. M. Lirola, J. Chovanec // Discourse & Society. –2012. Vol.
23, N 5. – P. 487– 507.194. Lorber, J. Paradoxes of Gender. – New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.– 436 p.195. McLuhan, M. War and Peace in the Global Village. – Berkeley: GingkoPress, 2001. – 192 p.155196. McLuhan, M. Culture is Our Business. – New York: McGraw Hill, 1970. –340 p.197. McLuhan, M. The Global Village: Transformations in World Life. A Mediain the 21st century.
– New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. – 220 p.198. McLuhan, M. Understanding media: The extensions of man. – Cambridge,London: Mit Press, 1994. – 389 p.199. Meaning of «like» in the English Dictionary // Cambridge Dictionary[Электронныйресурс].–Режимдоступа:http://dictionary.cambridge.org/ru/dictionary/english/like (дата обращения 04.02.2017)200.
Moi, T. What Is a Woman? And Other Essays. – Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2001. – 544 p.201. Morgan, G. Image of organization. – Beverly Hills: Sage, 1986. – 424 p.202. Morgan, K. P. Women and the Knife: Cosmetic Surgery and theColonization of Women’s Bodies // Hypathia. – 1991. – Vol. 6, N 3. – P. 25– 53.203. Nicholson, L. Interpreting gender // Signs. – 1994. – 20. (1) – P. 79– 105.204. O’Barr, W.
Culture and the Ad. Exploring Otherness in the World ofAdvertising. – Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1994. – 224 p.205. O’Kelly, C. G. Women and Men in Society: Cross- Cultural Perspectives onGender Stratification / C. G. O’Kelly, L. S. Carney. –2 ed. –Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1986. – 336 p.206. Parsons, Т. Age and Sex in the Social Structure // Parsons T. Essays inSociological Theory Pure and Applied.
– Glencoe, Illinois, 1949. – P. 218–232.207. Parsons, T. Family. Socialization and Interaction Process / T. Parsons, R.Bales. – London: Routledge and Keganm Paul, 1956. – 353 р.208. Phillips, K. Body dysmorphic disorder: The distress of imagined ugliness //American Journal of Psychiatry. – 1991. –Vol. 148. – P. 1138–1149.209. Pleck, J. H. The myth of masculinity.
– Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1981.– 229 p.156210. Pleck, J.H. The gender role strain paradigm: An update // A NewPsychology of Men / R. F. Levant, W. S. Pollack. – New York, 1995. – P. 581–592.211. Scott, J. W. Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis // TheAmerican Historical Review.
– 1986. – Vol. 91, N 5. – P. 1053–1075.212. Shilling, C. Changing bodies: habit, crisis and creativity. – London: SAGEPublications Ltd., 2008 – 216 p.213. Shilling, C. The Body in Culture, Technology and Society. – London: SAGEPublications Ltd., 2005. – 242 p.214. Soley-Beltran, P. Modelling Femininity // European Journal of Women'sStudies. – 2004. – Vol. 11, N 3.
– P. 309–326.215. Stuart, A. Choosing to conform: The discursive complexities of choice inrelation to feminine beauty practices / A. Stuart, N. Donaghue // Feminism andPsychology. – 2012. 22 (1). – P. 98–121.216. Tartakovskaya, I. The Changing Representation of Gender Roles in theSoviet and PostSoviet Press // Gender, State and Society in the Soviet and PostSovietRussia /Ed. S. Ashwin. – L.: Routledge, 2000. – P.
118–136.217. Thomas, M. J. Consumer market research: does it have validity? Somepostmоdern thoughts // Marketing Intelligence & Planning. – 1997. – Vol. 15, N 2. – P.54–59.218. Turner, B. S. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. ThirdEdition. – London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008. – 296 p.219. Turner, B. S. Regulating bodies. Essays in medical sociology. – New Yorkand London: Routledge, 1992.
