Диссертация (Генезис бухгалтерского учета в общественном секторе экономики), страница 103
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Генезис бухгалтерского учета в общественном секторе экономики". PDF-файл из архива "Генезис бухгалтерского учета в общественном секторе экономики", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "экономика" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве СПбГУ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с СПбГУ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой докторскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени доктора экономических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 103 страницы из PDF
N 43(2). Рр. 105–13.499.Hicks J. Capital controversies: ancient and modern // The American Economic Review.1974. Vol. 64, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting of the AmericanEconomic Association (May, 1974). Pp. 307-316.500.Hicks J.R. The valuation of the social income // Economica, New Series. 1940. Vol.
7, N26 (May). Pp. 105-124.501.Hood C. A public management for all seasons // Public Administration. 1991. Vol. 69.Pp. 3-19.502.Hood C. Emerging issues in public administration // Public Administration. 1995. Vol.73, Is 1. Pp. 165-183.382503.Hooper K., Kearins K., Green R. Knowing “the price of everything and the value ofnothing”: Accounting for heritage assets // Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2005. Vol.18, Is. 3. Pp.
410-433.504.Hopwood A.J. Editorial: after 30 years // Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2005.N 30. Pp. 585-586.505.Hoskin K. Boxing clever: for, against and beyond Foucault in the battle for accountingtheory // Critical Perspectives in Accounting. 1994. Vol. 5, Is. 1.
Pp. 57-85.506.Jacobs K. Making sense of social practice: Theoretical pluralism in public sectoraccounting research // Financial Accountability & Management. 2012. Vol, N 1. Pp. 126.507.Jackson A., Lapsley, I. The diffusion of accounting practices in the new ‘managerial’public sector // International Journal of Public Sector Management. 2003. Vol. 16. N 5. Pp.
359-72.508.Johansson T., Siverbo S. Why is research on management accounting change notexplicitly evolutionary? Taking the next step in the conceptualisation of management accounting change// Management Accounting Research 2009. N 20 (2). Pp. 146-162.509.Jones R. National accounting, government budgeting and the accounting discipline //Financial Accountability & Management.
2000. N 16(2). Pp. 101-116.510.Karelskaya S., Zuga E. Balance-sheet theory of A. P. Rudanovsky // Economics andManagement. 2012. N 17(1). Pp. 38-44.511.Killian S., O’Regan P. Social accounting and the co-creation of corporate legitimacy //Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2016. N 50. Pp. 1-12.512.Klamer A. Accounting for social and cultural values // De Economist. 2002. N 150 (4).Pp. 453-473.513.Klamer A.
An accountant among economists: conversations with Sir John R. Hicks // TheJournal of Economic Perspectives. 1989. Vol. 3(4). Pp. 167-180.514.Klamer A. McCloskey D. Accounting as the master metaphor of economics // EuropeanAccounting Review. 1992. Vol. 1, N. 1. Pp. 145-160.515.Kuter M. I., Gurskaya M. M., Sidiropulo O. A.
The Genoese Commune Massari’s ledgerof 1340: The first computer modeling experience and its results // Journal of Modern Accounting andAuditing. 2013. Vol. 9, N 2. Pp. 212-229.516.Kuznets S. National income // National Bureau of Economic Research Bulletin. 1937. N66, September 27. Pp.
1-16.517.Lambert V. Lapsley I. Redefining the boundaries of public sector accounting research? //The Irish Accounting Review. 2006. Vol. 13, Special Issue. Pp. 85–105.383518.Lapsley I. Anthony Hopwood and Cyril Tomkins, Editors, Issues in Public SectorAccounting (Oxford: Philip Allan Publishers, Ltd., 1984, pp. ix, 247, £18.00 cloth, £8.95 paper) // TheAccounting Review. 1985. Vol. 60, N 3 (Jul., 1985). Pp. 573-574.519.Lapsley I. New Public Management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? //ABACUS.
2009. Vol. 45, N 1. Pp. 1-21.520.Lapsley I. Research in public sector accounting // Accounting, Auditing & AccountabilityJournal. 1988. Vol. 1, N 1. Pp. 21–33.521.Lapsley I.The NPM agenda: back to the future // Financial Accountability andManagement.
2008. Vol. 24, N 1. Pp. 77-96.522.Lapsley I., Mussari R., Paulsson G. On the adoption of accrual accounting in the publicsector: A self-evident and problematic reform // European Accounting Review. 2009, Vol.18, N 4. Pp.719-723.523.Legay M.-L. The beginnings of public management: Administrative science and politicalchoices in the eighteenth century in France, Austria, and the Austrian Netherlands // The Journal ofModern History. 2009, N 81.
Pp. 253–293.524.Legay M.-L. La science des comptes dans les monarchies française et Autrichienneu XVIIIe Siècle. Le modèle Colbertiste en cause // Histoire et Mesure. 2010. Vol. XXV, N 1. Pp. 231260.525.Lee B. New public management, accounting, regulators and moral panics // InternationalJournal of Public Sector Management.
2012. Vol. 2, N 3. Pp. 192-202.526.Lemarchand Y. Double entry versus charge and discharge accounting in eighteenth-century France // Accounting Business & Financial History. 1994. Vol. 4, Is. 1. Pp. 119-145.527.Lemarchand Y. Introducing double-entry bookkeeping in public finance: a Frenchexperiment at the beginning of the 18th century // Accounting, Business & Financial History. 1999. Vol.9, N 2. Pp. 22554.528.Llewelyn S. What counts as “theory” in qualitative management and accounting research?Introducing five levels of theorizing // Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2003.
Vol. 16,Is. 4. Pp. 662-708.529.Macintosh N. B., Scapens, R. W. Structuration theory in management accounting// Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1990. N 15(5). Pp. 455-477.530.McKinlay A, Pezet E. Accounting for Foucault // Critical Perspectives onAccounting. 2010. N 21(6). Pp. 486-495.531.Miller P., Napier Ch. Genealogies of calculation // Accounting, Organizations andSociety. 1993. N 18 (7-8). Pp.
631-647.384532.Miller P., Hopper T., Laughlin R. The new accounting history: An introduction //Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1991. N 16. Pp. 395–403.533.Miller P. O'Leary T. Accounting and the construction of the governable person //Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1987. Vol. 12, N 3. Pp. 235-265.534.Molisa P.
A spiritual reflection on emancipation and accounting // Critical Perspectiveson Accounting. 2011. Vol. 22, Is. 5. Pp. 453–484.535.Monsen N. The case for cameral accounting // Financial Accountability & Management.2002. Vol. 18, Is. 1. Pp. 39-72.536.Napier C. J. Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research // Accounting,Organizations and Society. 2006. N 31. Pp. 445-507.537.Napier C. J. Accounting history and accounting progress // Accounting History. 2001. N6(2).
Pp. 7–31.538.Napier C. J. Research directions in accounting history // The British Accounting Review.1989. N 21. Pp. 237–254;539.Neimark, M. The king is dead. Long live the king! // Critical Perspectives on Accounting.1990. N 1(1). Pp. 103–114.540.Pallot J. Beyond NPM: developing strategic capacity // Financial AccountabilityManagement. 1999. Vol. 15(3/4).
Pp. 419-426.541.Pallot J. Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting // Accounting,Auditing & Accountability Journal. 1992. Vol. 5, Is. 1. Pp. 38-59.542.Pallot J. The nature of public assets: A response to Mautz // Accounting Horizons. 1990.Vol. 4, Is. 2.
Pp. 79-85.543.Pettersen, I. J. Accountable management reforms: why the Norwegian reform experimentgot lost in implementation // Financial Accountability & Management. 1999. N 15 (3) & (4). Pp. 377396.544.Piketty T., Zucman G. Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries 1700–2010// The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2014.
N 129 (3). P. 1255-1310.545.Pina V., Torres L., Yetano A. Accrual accounting in the EU local governments: onemethod, several approaches // European Accounting Review. 2009. Vol. 18, N 4. Pp. 765-807.546.Platonova N. V. Peter the Great’s government reforms and accounting practice in Russia// Accounting History. 2009. Vol. 14, N 4. Pp. 437-464.547.Raffournier B., Schatt A. Is academic accounting research fairly reflected in academicjournals & an investigation of possible non-mainstream and language barrier biases // EuropeanAccounting Review. 2010.
Vol. 19, N 1. Pp. 161-190.385548.Revell J. The National balance sheet of the United Kingdom // The Review of Incomeand Wealth. 1966. Vol. 12, Is. 4. Pp. 281-305.549.Rossi F. M., Jorge S., Jesus M. A., Caperchione E. Introduction to a symposium on newchallenges for public-sector accounting: IPSAS, budgetary reporting, and national accounts //International Journal of Public Administration. 2015. N 38:4. Pp. 237-239.550.Richard J. The dangerous dynamics of modern capitalism (From static to IFRS’ futuristicaccounting) // Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2015. Vol. 30. Pp.
9-34.551.Robertson J., Funnell W. The Dutch East-India Company and accounting for socialcapital at the dawn of modern capitalism 16021623 // Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2012. N37. Pp. 342–343.552.Roslender R. So tell me again… just why would you want to account for people? // Journalof Human Resource Costing & Accounting. 2009. Vol. 13, Is. 2. Pp. 143 – 153.553.Roslender R., Dillard J. Reflections on the interdisciplinary perspectives on accountingproject // Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
2003. Vol. 14. Pp. 325-351.554.Roslender R., Stevenson J. Accounting for people: A real step forward or more a case ofwishing and hoping? // Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 2009. N 20. Pp. 855–869.555.Sargiacomo M., Gomes D. Accounting and accountability in local government: Contributionsfrom accounting history research // Accounting History. 2011. N 16(3). Pp. 253–290.556.Sargiacomo M., Servalli S. & Andrei P. Fabio Besta: accounting thinker and accountinghistory pioneer // Accounting History Review.
