slioussar resume EN (Experimental study of several core concepts of theoretical morphology (on the material of russian) - regularity, syncretism, markedness), страница 5

2004. P. 496–507.Badecker, W., Kuminiak, F. Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production:Evidence from gender and case in Slovak // Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 56. 2007. P. 65–85.Bader, M., Meng, M. Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: an across-the-board comparison //Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Vol. 28. 1999. P. 121–144.Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Treiman, R.

The EnglishLexicon Project // Behavior Research Methods. Vol. 39. 2007. P. 445–459.Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Pizzamiglio, L., D’Amico, S., Hernandez, A. Gender and lexical access in Italian //Perception and Psychophysics. Vol. 57. 1995. P. 847–862.Beretta, A., Campbell, C., Carr, T. H., Huang, J., Schmitt, L. M., Christianson, K., Cao, Y. An ER-fMRIinvestigation of morphological inflection in German reveals that the brain makes a distinction between regular andirregular forms // Brain and Language.

Vol. 85. 2003. P. 67–92.Bock, K., Miller, C. A. Broken agreement // Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 23. 1991. P. 45–93.Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M. The role of contrast in the local licensing of scrambling in German: Evidencefrom online comprehension // Journal of Germanic Linguistics. Vol. 18. 2006. P. 1-43.Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., Friederici, A.

Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntacticintegration: The role of inter-versus intrasentential predictions // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory and Cognition. Vol. 29. 2003. P. 871–882.Brehm, L., Bock, K. What counts in grammatical number agreement? // Cognition. Vol. 128. 2013. P. 149–169.Caffarra, S., A.

Siyanova-Chanturia, F. Pesciarelli, F. Vespignani, Cacciari, C. Is the noun ending a cue togrammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian // Psychophysiology. Vol. 52. 2015.P. 1019–1030.Clahsen, H. Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection // Behavioraland brain sciences.

Vol. 22. 1999. P. 991–1060.Clifton, Ch., Jr., Frazier, L., Deevy, P. Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension // Rivista di Linguistica.Vol. 11. 1999. P. 11–39.Coltheart, M. The MRC psycholinguistic database // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, SectionA. Vol. 33. 1981. P. 497–505.Davis, C. J. N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics // BehaviorResearch Methods. Vol. 37.

2005. P. 65–70.Davis, C. J., Perea, M. BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhoodstatistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish // Behavior Research Methods. Vol. 37. 2005. P. 665–671.de Diego-Balaguer, R., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Bahlmann, J., Heinze, H. J., Münte, T.

F. Neural circuitssubserving the retrieval of stems and grammatical features in regular and irregular verbs // Human Brain Mapping.Vol. 27. 2006. P. 874–888.Desai, R., Conant, L. L., Waldron, E., Binder, J. R. fMRI of past tense processing: the effects of phonologicalcomplexity and task difficulty // Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Vol. 18. 2006. P. 278–297.Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., Phillips, C.

Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora:Experimental and modeling evidence // Journal of Memory and Language. Vol. 69. 2013. P. 85–103.17Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., Carreiras, M. EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish wordproperties // Behavior Research Methods.

Vol. 45. 2013. P. 1246–1258.Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., Bock, K. Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production //Psychological Review. Vol. 112. 2005. P. 531–559.English: Evidence from event-related brain potentials // Cognitive Brain Research. Vol. 7. 1999. P. 241–253.Erdocia, K., Laka, I., Mestres-Misse, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A. Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolutionin a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque // Brain and Language.Vol.

109. 2009. P. 1–17.Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U. H., Rizzi, L. Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction //Cognition. Vol. 101. 2006. P. 173–216.Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Antón-Méndez, I., Collina, S., Frauenfelder, U. H. The interplay of syntax and form inlanguage production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes.Vol. 23. 2008.

P. 329–374.Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., Nicol, J. Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactichierarchy // Language and Cognitive Processes. Vol. 17. 2002. P. 371–404.Frazier, L., Flores d’Arcais, G. B. Filler-driven parsing: a study of gap-filling in Dutch // Journal of Memory andLanguage.

Vol. 28. 1989. P. 331–344.Gollan, T.H., Frost, R. Two routes to grammatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew // Journal of PsycholinguisticResearch. Vol. 30. 2001. P. 627–651.Gor, K., Chernigovskaya, T. Mental Lexicon Structure in L1 and L2 Acquisition: Russian Evidence // Glossos.Vol. 4. 2003 (http://slaviccenters.duke.edu/projects/glossos-journal/issues/issue-4).Gor, K., Chernigovskaya, T. Rules in the processing of Russian verbal morphology // Current Issues in FormalSlavic Linguistics / ed. G. Zybatow, U.

Junghanns, G. Mehlhorn, L. Szucsich. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang,2001. P. 528–536.Hartsuiker, R. J., Schriefers, H. J., Bock, K., Kikstra, G. M. Morphophonological influences on the constructionof subject-verb agreement // Memory and Cognition. Vol. 31. 2003. P. 1316–1326.Haspelmath, M. Against markedness (and what to replace it with) // Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 42.

2006. P. 25–70.Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., Kliegl, R. dlexDB — einelexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung // Psychologische Rundschau. Vol. 62.2011. P. 10–20.Hyönä, J., Hujanen, H. Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish: an eye fixationanalysis // The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A Human Experimental Psychology. Vol.

50A.1997. P. 841–858.Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Hagoort, P., Herzog, H., Sach, M., Seitz, R. A PET study of cerebral activation patternsinduced by verb inflection // Neuroimage. Vol. 5. 1997. P. S548.Jaeger, J. J., Lockwood, A. H., Kemmerer, D. L., Van Valin, R. D., Jr., Murphy, B. W., Khalak, H. G. A positronemission tomographic study of regular and irregular verb morphology in English // Language.

Vol. 72. 1996.P. 451–497.Joanisse, M. F., Seidenberg, M. S. Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions duringregular and irregular past-tense processing // Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience. Vol. 5. 2005.P. 282–296.Kaiser, E., Trueswell, J. C. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language //Cognition.

Vol. 94. 2004. P. 113–147.Kireev, M.V., Slioussar, N., Korotkov, A.D., Chernigovskaya, T.V., Medvedev, S.V. Changes in functionalconnectivity within the fronto-temporal brain network induced by regular and irregular Russian verb production //Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Vol. 9. Art. 36. 2015. P. 1–10. DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00036.MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J. Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model //Cognition. Vol. 40. 1991. P. 121–157.18Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K. Dissociating types of mental computation // Nature. Vol. 387. 1997.

P. 592–594.Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K. Rules, representations, and the English past tense // Trends in CognitiveSciences. Vol. 2. 1998. P. 428–435.Martin, A. E., Nieuwland, M. S., Carreiras, M. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammaticalsentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis.

Brain and Language. Vol. 135. 2014. P. 42–51.McClelland, J. L., Patterson, K. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does the evidence rule out? //Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Vol. 6. 2002. P. 465–472.Miyamoto, E., Takahashi, S. Sources of difficulty in processing scrambling in Japanese // Sentence processing inEast-Asian languages / Ed. by M. Nakayama. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2002. P. 167–188.New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., Ferrand, L. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database.

Behavior ResearchMethods, Instruments, and Computers. Vol. 36. 2004. P. 516–524.Newman, A. J., Ullman, M. T., Pancheva, R., Waligura, D. L., Neville, H. J. An ERP study of regular and irregularEnglish past tense inflection // NeuroImage. Vol. 34. 2007. P. 435–445.Nicol, J., Forster, K., Veres, C. Subject–verb agreement processes in comprehension // Journal of Memory andLanguage. Vol.

36. 1997. P. 569–587.Oh, T. M., Tan, K. L., Ng, P., Berne, Y. I., Graham, S. The past tense debate: is phonological complexity the keyto the puzzle? // Neuroimage. Vol. 57. 2011. P. 271–280.Orsolini, M., Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Universals in morphological representation: evidence from Italian //Language and Cognitive Processes.

Vol. 12. 1997. P. 1–47.Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., Bock, K. Agreement processes in sentence comprehension // Journal ofMemory and Language. Vol. 41. 1999. P. 427–456.Pinker, S. Rules of language // Science. Vol. 253. 1991. P. 530–535.Pinker, S. Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Harper Collins, 1999.Pinker, S., Prince, A. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model oflanguage acquisition // Cognition. Vol. 28.